Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-08-24

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.

Is this a good way of providing work for others?

Should people do these things themselves?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In recent years, shortage of time has become increasingly prevalent in many countries, giving rise to considerable debate. While some people believe that people should do their housework by their own, others argue that it is better to pay someone to do their work. I strongly believe that it is good way to give opportunity to work to others to improve productivity rate.

On the one hand, one of the main reasons of giving work to others is that it allows people to work efficiently and effectively. This can be largely attributed to the fact that individuals who are working full-time and has not free time to do household chores can get a benefit from these services. As a result, persons can use their extra time in leisure activities, which can have a significant impact on their health.For example, workers who are hire helping people at home are far more productive. Hence, it is evident that giving work to others are more substantial.

On the other hands, opponents contend that people should do their housework by themselves. It is mainly because of lack of security, which can impact their personal life. Moreover, due to sedentary lifestyle at workplaces individuals do not get time for physical activity, so if person do their work by their own it will be beneficial for their health as well. For instance, it is clear that people who are work their household chores are more active and fit. Therefore, it is fact that people should do their own work.

In conclusion, after considering both the options, I firmly believe that giving work to others is best option because it helps people to get the job to meet their expectations.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

You have addressed both parts of the prompt, discussing the benefits of outsourcing tasks and the counter-argument regarding doing things oneself. However, the development of your ideas is somewhat limited. For instance, while you mention that outsourcing improves productivity, you do not fully explain how this creates a broader economic benefit or 'work for others'. Your position is clear, but the supporting arguments lack depth and specific examples. To improve, ensure that each body paragraph provides a more detailed explanation of the 'why' and 'how' behind your claims, rather than just stating them.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is logically organized into paragraphs, and you use basic cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand', 'On the other hands', and 'In conclusion'. However, the flow between sentences is sometimes mechanical. There are instances where the connection between ideas is slightly disjointed, such as the transition between the health benefits of leisure and the productivity of workers. Additionally, there are minor errors in referencing, such as 'On the other hands' (should be 'hand'). Improving the variety of your linking words and ensuring smoother transitions between sentences would elevate your score.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'prevalent', 'sedentary lifestyle', and 'substantial'. However, there are several instances of awkward word choices and collocations, such as 'do their housework by their own' (should be 'on their own') and 'workers who are hire helping people' (should be 'hiring domestic help'). These errors do not impede communication, but they do limit your ability to convey ideas with precision. Expanding your vocabulary to include more precise collocations related to employment and lifestyle would be beneficial.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text. Examples include subject-verb agreement issues like 'individuals who are working full-time and has not free time' (should be 'have no free time') and 'giving work to others are more substantial' (should be 'is'). Additionally, there are errors with articles and prepositions, such as 'it is good way' (should be 'a good way'). While these errors rarely prevent the reader from understanding your meaning, they are frequent enough to prevent a higher band score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.