Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-14
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.
Is this a good way of providing work for others?
Should people do these things themselves?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
It is occasionally potential to pay a person to do things you don’t need to do, or don’t have time to do, for example, Household chores or looking after children. In my opinion this is the good way of providing works for others, but people should take some responsibility themselves.
Firstly, People give other person household jobs, it helps create employment and income, Mainly, Housework, Cleaning, Cooking, child care which can increase source of income many people. For example, any family hire cooks and other job for their house, people can earn money, and fulfil their house responsibility and survive their life. Moreover, these types of job can help for people, they do not have good skills and higher educations. They can earn these types of doing work, and they can b shift their lifestyle.
Secondly, it helps for busy people, nowadays many people do a job long hours, so they do not have enough time to do household work. If they hire domestic worker so they spent time with their own family, for example, working parents can appoint babysitter for looking after baby. Moreover, they provide other jobs, therefore they can reduce stress and freely enjoy their own work and maintain their personal life
Although people do not depend on all work, People should take responsibility themselves, Most important individuals should spend time with children and involve their essential part also take care of their family members.
In conclusion, my personal opinion that, individuals provide other people jobs, it creates employment good way, It support to busy people, still People should take duty for themselves their families.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response addresses both parts of the prompt, discussing whether paying others for chores provides good employment and whether people should still perform these tasks themselves. The position is clear throughout, and the ideas are relevant, though some development is limited. For instance, the discussion on how domestic jobs help individuals without higher education is valid, but the supporting examples remain somewhat repetitive and brief. The conclusion neatly restates the dual stance. Overall, the content demonstrates a satisfactory engagement with the prompt, aligning with the requirements of Band 6.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is structured with an introduction, three body paragraphs, and a conclusion, showing an overall coherent arrangement. Paragraphing is utilised to separate the main ideas, such as employment benefits versus personal responsibilities. However, logical progression is occasionally hindered by mechanical or faulty cohesive devices. Words like 'Mainly,' 'Secondly,' and 'Although' are used, but sentences within paragraphs often rely on comma splices or loose connections rather than smooth transitions. Referencing is sometimes unclear, particularly with pronoun usage and abrupt shifts between ideas, placing the response in Band 5.5.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, allowing the writer to communicate basic ideas about employment, housework, and family responsibilities. However, there are noticeable lexical inaccuracies and awkward word choices, such as 'occasionally potential' instead of 'possible,' 'providing works' instead of 'work,' and 'b shift their lifestyle.' Less common items are attempted, but collocation errors are frequent. Spelling is generally acceptable, but the overall range is limited, fitting the Band 5 descriptors.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, incorporating conditional and relative clauses. However, control over grammar and punctuation is inconsistent. There are frequent grammatical errors, including missing articles, incorrect prepositions, and run-on sentences joined improperly with commas, such as in 'For example, any family hire cooks and other job for their house, people can earn money...' These errors frequently cause strain and difficulty for the reader, matching the profile of a Band 5 performance.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.