Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-15

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.

Is this a good way of providing work for others?

Should people do these things themselves?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Sometimes it is possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children. I agree that this is a good way of providing work for others, and I will explain this with relevant examples.

The first reason is that sometimes you get physically and mentally tired from your daily routine and think that you need a break, so you decide to hire somebody to do your household chores and look after the children, and you can go somewhere where you can find peace and feel relaxed, like going on vacation, going to a spa, or shopping, doing those activities that make you feel relaxed. For instance, my mom got sick, and at that time my sister and I were small, so we hired somebody to take care of our home, and we let my mom rest. Secondly, your schedule is so busy so are not able to focus on either your wok and home. Mostly, it happens when ever adult is working in the house; especially, it get worst situation if you have small children at home.

Thirdly, sometimes somebody needs help or is looking for work and doesn't have enough experience or education to get any job, so it good way of earning money, especially in urban areas, as they need more because their lifestyle is different from rural areas. Also, you can do it as a part-time job, which will help you to pay your expenses. As we saw in foreign countries, people do these kinds of jobs because they are not qualified for any other jobs, so to support themselves and their families, it is the best way.

In conclusion, I would say that there are many that I agree with paying somebody to do things you don't want to do; the choice is yours what you think about it.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt, discussing whether outsourcing chores is a good way to provide work and whether people should do these things themselves. The student presents a clear position agreeing with the proposition. However, the development of ideas is somewhat uneven. The second paragraph focuses heavily on the benefits of taking a break and personal tiredness rather than fully exploring the core debate of whether people *should* do these things themselves. The third paragraph addresses employment opportunities well, though the reasoning relies on somewhat broad generalisations. Overall, the task is addressed with relevant ideas, but the support lacks the depth and extension required for higher bands.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The response is arranged into an introduction, three body paragraphs, and a conclusion, showing a clear overall structure. However, paragraphing and internal cohesion are problematic. The second paragraph is a massive, run-on structure containing multiple ideas without adequate subdivision, making it hard to follow. Cohesive devices are sometimes mechanical or misused, such as 'Secondly, your schedule is so busy so are not able', where the transition is grammatically awkward. Referencing is occasionally unclear, and the conclusion is weak and abrupt, failing to summarise the main points effectively.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary used is generally adequate for the task, allowing the student to communicate basic ideas about employment, daily routines, and household chores. However, the range is somewhat limited and repetitive, with frequent reliance on basic words like 'things', 'job', and 'good'. There are also lexical errors and awkward word choices, such as 'it get worst situation' and 'as they need more because their lifestyle is different'. Less common vocabulary is attempted with limited success and accuracy, placing this response firmly in the Band 5 to 6 range.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but control over grammar and punctuation is inconsistent. There are numerous grammatical errors throughout the text, including subject-verb agreement issues ('your schedule is so busy so are not able'), fragment sentences ('doing those activities that make you feel relaxed'), and run-on sentences with poor comma usage. These errors sometimes require the reader to re-read passages to fully grasp the meaning. While some simple sentences are error-free, the frequency of errors prevents the response from achieving a higher band.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.