Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-19

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.

Is this a good way of providing work for others?

Should people do these things themselves?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In today's modern world people often have hectic work life or perhaps they are lazy to do daily life tasks such as basic household chore or taking care of their offsprings.They always have a chance to take services from other people to do these things. This definately provides a work opportunity for the financially challenge sector of the society, but people should do this themselves more to stay fit and connected to their kids.

The best part about hiring someone for doing basic household work is that it benefits the low-income individuals. They often find it hard to manage their livelihood due to inconsistent jobs, and not having proper education for high pay jobs. By doing small things like providing care for the children and elderly, they can earn sufficiently to support their families. Moreover, this tasks takes significatly less time to finish which makes them able to take more work responsibilities at different places. For example, some person only needs aid with cooking, any househelp can do it within an hour and go to other house to do other things.

One major disadvantage of unfamiliar people coming to ones residence is the lose of privacy, which they can protect by doing the work by themselves. Furthermore, it assist the individuals to maintain their fitness and they will be doing several movements rather than sitting at one place. Consequently, spending time with the children or the elders build a healthy connection, which they can find missing if someone else is taking care of them. Also they can watch the progress in their studies and daily life by interacting with them. For instance, if the children are having hard time at studies, they can help them proving parently confort and solutions.

In conclusion, people can hire someone to do their work at home.On one side it provide income source for the poor, but also can cause privacy issue and emotinal neglect for their kids, which people can fix by doing their work by themselves.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The student addresses both parts of the prompt directly: whether outsourcing chores is a good way of providing work, and whether people should do these tasks themselves. A clear position is maintained throughout the response, with the introduction outlining both aspects and subsequent body paragraphs developing relevant ideas. The benefits to low-income earners are explored well, and the personal health and familial benefits of doing chores oneself are also presented. However, some ideas lack depth and could be extended further with more precise examples. Overall, the requirements of the task are well-met, aligning with Band 6.5 to 7.0 descriptors. Because all parts are addressed with a clear position and supported ideas, a band score of 6.5 is awarded.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay displays a generally clear overall progression and logical organisation. Paragraphing is utilised effectively, with a clear introduction, two body paragraphs exploring separate viewpoints, and a brief conclusion. Cohesive devices are present, such as 'Moreover', 'Furthermore', and 'Consequently', though some transitions feel slightly mechanical or formulaic. Pronoun referencing is generally adequate, but phrases like 'this tasks' and 'assist the individuals' show minor lapses in cohesive control. Paragraph structuring is sound, but greater flexibility in logical transitions would elevate the score further. This performance fits comfortably within the Band 6.0 to 6.5 descriptors; therefore, a band score of 6.0 is awarded.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The student demonstrates an adequate vocabulary range for the task, attempting some less common lexical items such as 'financially challenge sector', 'inconsistent jobs', and 'emotional neglect'. However, there are noticeable word-form and collocation errors, such as 'hectic work life' instead of 'hectic work lives', 'financially challenge' instead of 'financially challenged', and 'lose of privacy' instead of 'loss of privacy'. Spelling errors like 'emotinal' and 'proving parently confort' also occur. Despite these inaccuracies, communication is not impeded, and meaning remains clear throughout. These characteristics reflect the Band 6.0 descriptor profile, earning a band score of 6.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The response contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, including conditional forms and relative clauses. There are, however, frequent grammatical errors, particularly with subject-verb agreement and pluralisation, such as 'daily life tasks such as basic household chore', 'this tasks takes', and 'if the children are having hard time at studies'. Articles are occasionally misused, as seen in 'at different places' and 'earn sufficiently'. While these errors are noticeable and require the reader to occasionally pause, they do not impede overall communication. Because there is a reasonable mix of sentence structures alongside persistent errors, the writing aligns closely with the Band 6.0 descriptors.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.