Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-23

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.

Is this a good way of providing work for others?

Should people do these things themselves?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Nowadays, many people choose to pay other people to do their hosehold chores or looking after their babies, which is very positive approach for creating employment opportunities for others as they are busy in their professional life. Although, people should invole in their family responsibities and not completely relay on others. In this essay, we discuss both the arguments.

First of all, people who are busy in their professional life, they are fighting for their servival. Therefor, they can't pay attention to their daily household choes or look after their children so, they hire other people for their hosuehold and children responsibilities, which create jobs opportunities for unempolyments people. For example, professional doctors, lawyers and actors are busy in performing their duties they cannot give attention to their home and children, which is understandable.

However, I believe that people should not competely depend on others for household responsibilities. Parents, should spend sufficent time with their children and invole with family gathering. Because the things a parents taught to their children with emotions and love nobody else can do it as well as parents do.

That said, its is not practicle for the people to do all their household chores without assisstance, because in this era for the better lifestlye for their families men and women work together. Therefor, they dont have enough time to cover all their household responsibilites alone.

In conclusion, paying others to perform household tasks can be an effective way of creating employment and helping busy person to mange their professional life. Nevertheless, individuals should must also look after their responsibilities as it involves their family relationships.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The student addresses all parts of the task by discussing both whether paying others to do household chores or childcare is a good way to provide employment and whether people should do these things themselves. A clear position is maintained throughout the essay. The ideas are generally relevant and extended, such as noting how busy professionals like doctors or lawyers need assistance while still emphasizing the importance of family bonding. However, some arguments lack deeper elaboration and tend to generalize. For instance, the explanation of why parents are irreplaceable could be supported by more detailed examples. Overall, the task response meets the requirements for a Band 6.0, as all parts are addressed with relevant ideas, though some development is slightly limited.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with a recognizable introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used sufficiently to divide distinct points, such as the benefits of employment versus the importance of personal parental involvement. Cohesive devices are employed, including transition markers like "First of all," "However," and "In conclusion." Nevertheless, referencing and cohesion are sometimes faulty or mechanical, and occasional abrupt transitions make the progression slightly bumpy. For example, sentences in the first body paragraph feel crowded and lack smooth inter-sentence connections. Punctuation errors also disrupt the flow in places. Consequently, the organization aligns best with Band 6.0 descriptors.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The student demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common items such as "professional life," "employment opportunities," and "responsibilities." However, there are noticeable spelling and word-choice errors throughout the text, including "hosehold" instead of household, "servival" instead of survival, "choes" instead of chores, "unempolyments" instead of unemployed, and "mange" instead of manage. While these errors do not severely impede communication, they reflect recurrent inaccuracies in spelling and derivation. The lexical control is inconsistent, which places this performance firmly at Band 5.5, as the vocabulary is minimally adequate but marred by noticeable mechanical errors.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, incorporating subordinating conjunctions like "Although," "because," and "which." However, grammatical accuracy is weak, with frequent errors including subject-verb agreement issues and awkward phrasing, such as "people who are busy in their professional life, they are fighting for their servival," and "individuals should must also look after." There are also missing articles and preposition errors, such as "busy in their professional life." These errors occasionally require the reader to re-read to grasp the intended meaning, though they do not completely obscure communication. The control over complex structures is limited and frequently faulty, fitting the Band 5.0 descriptor well.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.