Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-26

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.

Is this a good way of providing work for others?

Should people do these things themselves?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In this modern world, many humans are facing different problems in their life. Due to the hectic daily schedule, many people prefer to spend money on the activities which they won't be able to do or they do not want to complete. This essay will disscuss all the possible causes behind it with relevant examples.

It is clear that, spending money on creating jobs will create several advantages to the both worker and employer. To begin with, hiring worker will save some time from the daily household chores. For example, Someone who is constantly busy in their daily life can spend time in the lasure activities which they want to do. In addition, providing work will benefit the community development. For example, many people can earn money while studing or by working part-time. In much the same way, arranging childcare for children will also save time and improve the life style of busy working couple.

On the other hand, completing different task will also benefit in verious ways. Firstly, people can save more money, which they can utilize on other necessary things. Meanwhile, taking care of children by themself will strengthen the bond between the parents and children. As result, parents can provide good values and manners to their kids.

To conclude, both the perspective have their own pros and cons. Meanwhile, I also believe that, It is totally dependent on the situation and the circumstance of individual to hire someone for house help or complete that task their own.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt, discussing whether outsourcing chores provides work for others and whether people should do these tasks themselves. However, the development of ideas remains somewhat superficial. For instance, the discussion on providing work mentions community development and part-time work, but these points are under-developed and lack specific context. The position is generally clear throughout the essay, concluding that it depends on individual circumstances. While the prompt is adequately covered to meet the requirements of a Band 6, expanding further on the socio-economic implications of outsourcing or the personal benefits of self-reliance would elevate the depth of the argument. Overall, the content is relevant and fulfills the basic task requirements successfully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with clear paragraphing, dividing the introduction, body paragraphs for opposing views, and a conclusion. Cohesive devices such as 'To begin with', 'In addition', and 'On the other hand' are employed to structure the text, though some transitions feel a bit mechanical. Referencing is generally clear, but occasional minor disruptions in logical progression occur, such as the sudden shift to childcare without a smooth transition in the second body paragraph. Paragraphing is used sufficiently and appropriately to separate distinct arguments, ensuring that the reader can follow the overall flow of the discussion without significant confusion, placing it comfortably in the Band 6 territory.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, successfully attempting less common items such as 'hectic daily schedule', 'community development', and 'strengthen the bond'. However, there are noticeable spelling and word choice inaccuracies throughout the text, such as 'disscuss' instead of 'discuss', 'lasure' instead of 'leisure', 'studing' instead of 'studying', 'verious' instead of 'various', and 'themself' instead of 'themselves'. Furthermore, collocations are occasionally awkward, such as 'creating jobs will create several advantages'. Despite these errors, the vocabulary is sufficient to convey the main ideas without severely impeding communication, aligning with the Band 5.5 to 6 range.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The writer employs a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, attempting conditional and relative clauses with varying success. While some sentences are accurate, there are frequent errors in grammar, articles, and prepositions, such as 'hiring worker' instead of 'hiring workers', 'busy in their daily life' instead of 'busy with their daily lives', and 'both the perspective' instead of 'both perspectives'. Punctuation errors, such as unnecessary commas and capitalization issues (e.g., 'It is totally dependent'), are also present. These errors do not generally impede communication, but they persist frequently enough to prevent the response from achieving a higher band score, making a Band 5.5 appropriate.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.