Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.

Is this a good way of providing work for others?

Should people do these things themselves?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In this contemporary era, it is wrong to say if people do not have time for their children. However, in this modern world people usually get pay for doing some household chores and that is their income source. From my perspective, paying for such works is good for others because they depends on that income source,however, for upb ringing child people need to spend some time with their love ones.

It is commonly seen that, nowdays, both parents are working hard in this fast-growing world in order to achieve their goal. In that cases it is valid if they hire someone and pay for them to do their daily task. For instance, in many countries people usually get hire highly educated proffesionals for taking care of their child. Therefore, people who love to taking care of child will get an opportunity to earn money and develope their interest. Moreover, there are plenty of cleaning services and agencies are running to provide manpower for doing household chores. Thus, in order to make money this phenomenon have significant impact.

From my perspective, I strongly agree that people have to do their household chores by themselfes. Not everyone has a hectic schedule and they have to make a schedule in order to finish their routine. By doing such chores individuals can save good amount of money that they have to pay someone. For an example, it is scintific proven that, if individual perform such physical activity during the day then they can reduce the stress and anxiety. Also, they need to spend some time with their children so that they can get an idea how and what is going in their life.

To conclude, as a working parents it is hard to manage household chores, while providing work for others and paying them are valid.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt, discussing whether paying others for chores is good and whether people should do these things themselves. A position is stated, and supporting ideas such as economic benefits and stress reduction are introduced. However, the development of ideas lacks clarity in places due to confusing phrasing, particularly in the introduction and conclusion where the stance appears contradictory. For instance, the student states they strongly agree people should do chores themselves, yet also concludes that paying others is valid without fully resolving the tension between these views. Overall, the task is addressed, but the arguments require more consistent extension and logical support to reach a higher band.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay is divided into four paragraphs, showing a clear attempt at an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Logical sequencing is present, with paragraphs generally focused on distinct aspects of the prompt. However, cohesive devices are sometimes mechanical or misused, as seen in transitions like 'In that cases' and 'Thus, in order to make money this phenomenon have significant impact.' Paragraphing is adequate, but referencing and logical flow between sentences are occasionally clunky, which disrupts the progression of ideas. While the overall arrangement is coherent, the frequent awkward transitions prevent the response from achieving a higher band score.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The student demonstrates an adequate vocabulary range for the task, attempting some less common lexical items such as 'contemporary era,' 'fast-growing world,' and 'professionals.' However, there are notable word choice and collocation errors throughout the response, including 'get pay' instead of 'get paid,' 'upb ringing child,' 'taking care of child,' and 'scintific proven.' Spelling and morphological inaccuracies are noticeable, such as 'develope' and 'themselfes.' While these errors do not completely impede communication, they restrict the lexical score to a band 5.5 because precision and accurate word formation are lacking.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, attempting conditional and relative clauses such as 'if individual perform such physical activity during the day then they can reduce the stress.' However, grammatical accuracy is weak, with frequent errors in verb forms, subject-verb agreement, and articles, such as 'people usually get pay,' 'in that cases,' and 'as a working parents.' Punctuation is generally acceptable, but grammatical errors are frequent enough to cause some strain for the reader, aligning closely with the band 5 descriptors where complex structures frequently contain errors.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.