Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.

Is this a good way of providing work for others?

Should people do these things themselves?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is undeniable that people are more busier in the recent past than ever before. Due to this, people have less time or they become tired to finish their household chores. sometime they also hire the baby setter for their child. I personally believe that this is the positive development and it has several benefits.

The principle advantage of this is to create job opportunity for jobseekers. Usually there is no requirement of any qualification and any special expertise. Because of this, anyone can create side income by working part-time at any place such as hotels and mansions. In addition, multifarious developed nations seeking for a nanny because both the parents are actively working. Therefore, many students do this job while they are studying to full-fill their academic needs and expenses. As a results, unemployment can drastically drop and people can earn money.

On the other hand, in this competitive world, family member can berly gets a time to finish basic house work such as laundry, cooking or cleaning after having a hectic day weather at job or school. To illustrate, vast majority of working professionals spend roughly 12 hours outside their homes for office and commuting. Due to this, they are tired and fatigue to finish their basic household chores. As a result, individuals hire baby setters and part-time workers who do this work promptly.

In conclusion, almost all family members are working in this decade, therefore people have less time to take care of their basic work. Consequently, they hire people who ready to provide these services. I believe this is the best idea to maintain quality of life.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt regarding employment opportunities and whether people should perform these tasks themselves, though the ideas remain somewhat limited and under-developed. For instance, the writer states that outsourcing chores creates side income and helps students, but these points are expressed in general terms rather than being fully extended with specific explanations or robust examples. The position is discernible in the introduction and conclusion, but the reasoning throughout the body paragraphs tends to be repetitive. To reach higher bands, the writer needs to provide deeper elaboration and more fully developed supporting arguments for every part of the prompt rather than relying on brief assertions.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay displays some overall organization with clear paragraph breaks, dividing the introduction, two body paragraphs, and conclusion adequately. However, there is no clear overall progression of ideas, as the second body paragraph largely reiterates the time constraints and fatigue mentioned in the introduction rather than advancing a new dimension of the argument. Cohesive devices are sometimes inaccurate or repetitive, such as the frequent transitional openings ('In addition', 'As a results', 'On the other hand'). Referencing is also occasionally unclear, creating a somewhat mechanical flow. To improve, the writer should ensure that each paragraph introduces distinct, progressively developed points linked by a wider and more accurate range of cohesive features.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary used is minimally adequate for the task, featuring common terms along with some attempts at less common phrasing such as 'multifarious developed nations' and 'hectic day'. However, there are noticeable lexical errors in word choice, word form, and collocation throughout the text, including 'more busier', 'baby setter' instead of babysitter, and 'tired and fatigue' instead of tired and fatigued. These inaccuracies occasionally cause minor difficulty or distraction for the reader. To achieve a higher score, the writer must expand their lexical repertoire and use less common vocabulary with greater precision, ensuring correct word forms and natural collocations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The text demonstrates a limited range of sentence structures, with frequent errors in grammar that can occasionally cause difficulty for the reader. There are issues with comparative forms, such as 'more busier', and problems with subject-verb agreement and pluralisation, as seen in 'family member can berly gets a time'. Furthermore, attempts at complex sentences frequently contain errors, such as the dangling clause in 'weather at job or school' and incorrect prepositional or adverbial phrasing like 'As a results'. To progress to a higher band, the writer needs to increase grammatical accuracy across a wider mix of simple and complex sentence forms, paying closer attention to verb agreements, punctuation, and article usage.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.