Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-03

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.

Is this a good way of providing work for others?

Should people do these things themselves?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is undeniable that a considerable proportion of individuals are paying to others for their personal works due to of lack of time and interest. I believe this is a positive development because it creates job opportunities for disadvantaged background people and more time to invest in essential works. This essay will discuss both the aspects before drawing a reasoned conclusion.

To begin with, One of the most significant reason why i believe it is a positive development is largely because it will increase job opportunities for the unemployed and less skilled citizens and help to pay more attention on crucial work. For example, several working womens are facing challenges related to make a balance in betwwen thier work life and prespnal life. They left with no other option then hire someone for the personal works. As a result,Individuals will experience free from worry and more motivated. Therefore, it is evident that by providing employment to others for the house hold chores humans can invest thier time in something productive. Ultimately, it is a positive development as it will help in the overall growth.

Furthermore, Turning to the second statement i believe if peoples would try harder then they do not need to hire others however it will cost them with hectic schedule and much busier life style then before. People with busy schedule will not only suffer with stressful life but also it could lead them to serious consequesces related to health issues. For Instance, In recent years, working people will feel more tided and less energy when they returned home. When they are drained and left with no power then they have to push themselves towards the personal work and it will not be an effective for their health. Hence, people will suffer from severe serious illness.

To conclude, This issue is not about choosing one over other. It is more related to the convinence of differtent people according to their need. I believe, Individuals should include that suits their daily life. left with happiness and better lifestyle oppe

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both the employment benefits and whether people should handle tasks themselves, maintaining a clear position throughout. However, some ideas are under-developed or lack sufficient extension. For instance, the argument regarding working women facing challenges in balancing life is introduced but not fully explored before moving to another point. While the main aspects of the prompt are covered, the development tends to rely on generalisations rather than deep elaboration, such as when mentioning that failing to hire help leads to severe illness without sufficient support. To move to a higher level, the writer needs to more fully develop and substantiate each main idea with clearer examples and deeper reasoning.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay presents a coherent overall arrangement with a clear attempt at a logical progression of ideas from the introduction through the body paragraphs to the conclusion. Paragraphing is used sufficiently to separate distinct points, such as the benefits of hiring help versus the drawbacks of doing everything oneself. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical or faulty. Devices such as 'To begin with', 'Furthermore', and 'To conclude' are used, but referencing within sentences is not always clear, and some transitional links feel abrupt or repetitive. For instance, the transition into the second body paragraph relies heavily on formulaic phrases rather than smooth conceptual bridges. To improve, the writer should ensure that cohesive devices connect ideas naturally and that referencing pronouns point unambiguously to their intended antecedents.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The writer demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common words and phrases such as 'disadvantaged background people', 'hectic schedule', and 'drained'. However, there are noticeable errors in word choice, collocation, and word formation that recur throughout the text, such as 'paying to others for their personal works', 'working womens', 'prespnal life', 'house hold chores', 'convueses' (consequences), and 'convience'. These lexical inaccuracies occasionally cause some difficulty for the reader or require extra effort to parse. To achieve a higher band, the writer must expand their active vocabulary range with greater precision and eliminate frequent errors in word choice, spelling, and morphological forms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response displays a limited range of structures, featuring a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, though attempts at complex sentences are frequently faulty. There are persistent errors in grammar, punctuation, and agreement across the text, such as 'due to of lack of time', 'One of the most significant reason why i believe', 'They left with no other option then hire', 'peoples would try harder then they do not need', and 'working people will feel more tided and less energy'. These frequent errors can cause some difficulty for the reader, fitting the description of a text with noticeable grammatical strain. To reach the next band, the writer needs to increase sentence variety while exercising better control over verb forms, prepositions within grammatical patterns, subject-verb agreement, and articles.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.