Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-06

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.

Is this a good way of providing work for others?

Should people do these things themselves?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In this contemporary era, when folk have everything in their hands the only thing that is lacking from this generation is providing time to the loved ones or to do housework. In their rigid schedule humans are stuck in the dillema between the deadlines and responsibilities. I believe that it is better to have someone to take care of the household activities but there should be a limit.

To bolster the notion conceived, mortals are reaching the sky they are exploring every opportunity that can make them succeded in their business career. However, when it leaves the less time for them to participate in nessecary task at home such as cleaning, dishes, dustin, throwing the garbage and etc. To tackle this situation people hire a person to do this work in the absence of them. This statement can only be true only for the time being when accomplishment of the household chores.

On the negative side, this side of the society is leading their way to get away from their offspring. To recapitulate ,the purpose of not leaving their children to care taker is only because in the early stages of the life your kid needs your existence in every moment. The connection they feel with their guardian can not be explained. Every moment when they first walk, speak or do something it make the parent feel close to the child. The care taker is not gonna sense any of these because they might have seen it numerous times. Moreover, humans tend to get lazy and inactive when they don't take part in the housework.

To culminate, the strength of the human is achieving work-life balance. To get that if sometimes they want let go some of the housechores it is totally fine. But, relying heavily on the other person to do your especially fragile part of your off springs life is their childhood, humans should not be depended on paid care giver to nurture their child.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you support hiring help for household tasks, but argue that parents should remain closely involved in raising their children. You address both whether paid help provides work and whether people should do these tasks themselves, especially through the contrast between chores and childcare. The examples about children’s first steps and words make your concern about parental involvement relevant. However, the employment benefit is only briefly asserted, and the point that household help should be limited is not fully explained. Some claims, such as paid carers not valuing children’s milestones, would be stronger with qualification or support. Develop the benefits to workers and clarify which tasks people should retain themselves to make the response more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph supporting household help, a contrasting paragraph about childcare, and a conclusion. Transitions such as “On the negative side” and “To culminate” signal the direction of the argument. However, some links feel mechanical or do not clearly express the relationship between ideas. For example, “This statement can only be true only for the time being” is difficult to connect to the preceding point, and the conclusion combines several ideas in a sentence whose logic is hard to follow. References such as “this side of the society” are also unclear. Use simpler, more precise transitions and make each paragraph’s main point explicit before adding supporting details.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt a range of vocabulary, including “rigid schedule,” “household chores,” “work-life balance,” and “offspring,” and the topic is generally understandable. However, several choices are unnatural or inaccurate, which sometimes makes the meaning difficult to follow: “providing time to the loved ones,” “the strength of the human,” and “fragile part of your off springs life” do not express your intended ideas clearly. Spelling errors such as “dillema,” “succeded,” “nessecary,” and “dustin” are noticeable, while phrases such as “and etc.” are redundant. Aim for accurate, natural collocations rather than unusually formal synonyms, and proofread spelling and word forms. This would make your vocabulary more reliable and easier for the reader to process.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including clauses beginning with “when” and “because,” and your main position can usually be understood. However, some sentence structures are faulty or incomplete, and errors sometimes make relationships between ideas unclear. For example, “when it leaves the less time for them” lacks a clear grammatical subject, while “Every moment when they first walk, speak or do something it make the parent feel close” has a faulty clause structure and subject–verb agreement. The final sentence also contains several clauses that are not joined clearly. Work on complete sentence construction, agreement, articles, and punctuation, especially when combining several ideas. Shorter, controlled sentences will help you retain complexity without losing accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.