Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-14
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.
Is this a good way of providing work for others?
Should people do these things themselves?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
In this fast-paced world, stepping out of the homes and earning becomes a sort of necessity not only for a mle counterpart but also for a female counterpart. Being a professional couple means a lot more difficulties to run a home efficiently. As there are numerous chores at home ranging from keeping a home tidy and clean to look after a each member of house in terms of their food, clothes and health. At this satge, hiring a housemaid or nanny for kids becomes an indispensable.
In previous times, the men were responsible for financial aspects and the females were in-charge of managing a house thoroughly which intself includes a various roles. Specifically, doing a role of housemaid as looking after kitchen, doing cleaning, doing laundry and then comes a role of daughter-in-law, a wife and a mother. In today's time, the scenario is entirely changed as the women are pursuing their career. While being a working women, expecting them to do every other role at home is unfair and illogical. Therefore, hiring someone who could help them to run their homes efficiently and effectively is a good idea without giving a second thought to it. By doing this, a several other job opportunities have been created in the market which could ease the people's life overall.
Wether people should delegate their own duites or not is a highly peronal matter. Furthermore, there are factors which infulence their decision such as time, affordability, schedule. Predominantly, for kids and elderly people in house, a person is needed for all the times of a day. So, if individuals can afford to pay a care-taker, they would definitely go for that option instead of leaving them on their own.
Overall, for working professionals in developed countries hiring the worker who could take care of their home, kids, elder parents turns to be need of hour.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
Your position is clear: you support hiring help, particularly for working couples and families who need childcare or support for older relatives. You address both whether this creates work and whether people should do these tasks themselves, noting that paid help creates “job opportunities” and that delegation depends on “time, affordability, schedule.” These are relevant points, but the second question is less fully explored: the response does not explain when people might reasonably do chores themselves or weigh the benefits against drawbacks. Some claims, such as the contrast between men’s and women’s roles “in previous times,” are broad and would be stronger with a specific example or qualification. Develop both sides of the question more evenly and support key claims with concrete examples.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a recognisable structure, moving from the context of working couples to reasons for hiring help, then to factors affecting personal choice and a concluding view. Paragraphing helps the reader follow this overall progression, and linking expressions such as “Therefore,” “Furthermore,” and “Overall” signal relationships between ideas. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. For example, “As there are numerous chores…” is left as a dependent clause, and the list of household roles in the second paragraph does not clearly connect to the point that paid help creates jobs. The final paragraph introduces developed countries without explaining why this qualification matters. Use clearer topic sentences and make each paragraph’s examples directly support its main point.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “professional couple,” “financial aspects,” “job opportunities,” and “care-taker,” and the reader can generally understand your argument. There are also some less natural or inaccurate choices that limit precision, such as “female counterpart,” “run a home efficiently,” “a several other job opportunities,” and “need of hour.” Spelling errors including “Wether,” “peronal,” and “infulence” also reduce accuracy. Some repetition of “role” and “home” makes the expression less flexible. Aim for natural collocations and accurate word forms, and proofread spelling; for instance, use “working women” or “women in the workforce” rather than “a female counterpart,” and “a number of job opportunities” rather than “a several other job opportunities.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional structure in “if individuals can afford to pay a care-taker, they would definitely go for that option.” However, several sentence patterns are faulty, and these errors sometimes make relationships between ideas harder to follow. “As there are numerous chores at home…” is a fragment, while “hiring a housemaid or nanny for kids becomes an indispensable” lacks a grammatical completion. There are also problems with articles, agreement, and sentence construction, as in “a person is needed for all the times of a day” and “a working women.” Work on complete sentences, matching subjects and verbs, and using articles consistently. Revising each sentence for its main subject and verb will improve control.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.