Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-24

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.

Is this a good way of providing work for others?

Should people do these things themselves?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is often belived that you should pay for work you want to do frim someone but you have not enough time to do, while there is a group who belive that we should do this work by ourselves. From my opinion, we should pay for things that we cannot manage by our own.

Intially, the main reason of supporting my view that we should pay for work is that perfossionals who have to manage their work life and personal life equally should hire a peraon for their household chores.For example, a lady who have to take care her children and also manage job at the same time;paying for these tasks is the efficient method.When she hires someone, her life would definately be essay.

Other reason for supporting this idea is that it would also provide opportunities of employment for those who have poor financial position. Some people always search for job to meet their daily bread and butter hiring for households choers would be best option for them. As a result, ratio pf unemployment would be decrease in many societies.

On the other hand, there is a group who believe that we should work by our own because people who manage multitasks on the daily basis they are more energetic.This is not only for physical health but it also helps in mental well_being because it gives them a sense of satisfication.Additionally,the office workers also would not be able to keep an eye on them because of their busy schedule.

To sum up, although paying people for daily households chores best option for professionals it also creats employment oppurtunities for people.From my perspective, its good idea for people to take help from others instead of doing with hectic lifestyle.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both questions and maintain a clear position: you support paying others when people cannot manage tasks themselves. The employment point is relevant and gives the response a second reason, while the opposing view—that doing chores can support physical and mental well-being—shows awareness of another perspective. However, the reasons are not developed equally. The example of a working mother is relevant but brief, and the claim that household work would reduce unemployment is broad and would benefit from explanation or a specific illustration. The counterargument is also only partly answered: you mention busy office workers but do not explain how this supports your overall position. Develop each point with clearer cause-and-effect reasoning.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two paragraphs supporting your view, a paragraph presenting the opposing view, and a conclusion. This makes the main line of argument easy to follow. You also use signposting such as “For example,” “On the other hand,” and “To sum up.” At times, however, the links feel mechanical, and some references are unclear. For instance, “this work” and “these tasks” do not always identify precisely which duties you mean, while the transition from the employment argument to the opposing view is abrupt. Improve progression by linking each paragraph’s main idea to the next and using clearer references rather than relying mainly on formulaic transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “household chores,” “employment opportunities,” “unemployment,” and “mental well-being.” These choices help communicate the main ideas, and you attempt some less common expressions such as “sense of satisfaction.” However, spelling and word-choice errors are noticeable and sometimes make the reader pause: examples include “belived,” “perfossionals,” “choers,” and “oppurtunities.” Some phrases are also unnatural or imprecise, such as “meet their daily bread and butter” and “manage their work life and personal life equally.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations and check spelling carefully. A more precise range would help you express the employment and work-life arguments without relying on awkward phrasing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “people who manage multitasks” and a reason introduced by “because.” The overall meaning is generally recoverable, but errors in sentence structure and grammatical forms occur across the response. For example, “a lady who have to take care her children” has problems with subject–verb agreement and the verb pattern, while “ratio of unemployment would be decrease” uses an incorrect passive construction. There are also missing articles and punctuation problems, particularly where sentences run together after semicolons or full stops. Practise building accurate clauses first, then combine them using relative clauses and subordinating conjunctions; careful proofreading for agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries will improve control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.