Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-25
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.
Is this a good way of providing work for others?
Should people do these things themselves?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
In this modern era, due to hectic schedule people mostly hire a maid or home care assistant to take care of their house as well their childrens because this trend is becoming popular.I would discuss about people opinions in the upcoming body paragraphs.
Firstly,if people would hire someone for taking care of their houses then it would be frutiful for them because they can get some relief from their work as well it is not only helpful for them but also they can give employment to a needy person in which they can contribute to decrease unemployment also.On the other hand, this method can be became financial burden for any person who is struggling in their life. Therefore, if anyone is capable for hiring a maid or other for their work then it would be proven beneficial for him.Because they can utilize their quality time with their loved ones which is good for making stronger relationship.
Furthermore,people must be able to do their household works by themselves instead of depending on somebody because it can be harmful in some incidents.Because, if anyone arrange homecare assistent for childerns then it would be more worst for childrens development because by this way minors not only loss their cultural values but also they will unable to make their good bonding with their parents.Therefore, they should to do their senstive work by themselves especialy taking care of their younger ones.
In the conclusion,people must aware about positive or negative aspects of this trend if they are hired somebody for their household chores.Because it can became dangerous thing for their future generations if they give their younger ones in the home care.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both questions: hiring help is presented as a source of employment and relief for busy people, while doing care work oneself is linked to children’s development and family bonds. Your position is broadly understandable, especially in the recommendation that parents handle sensitive childcare themselves. However, the two sides are not equally developed. The employment point is asserted rather than supported with a concrete example, and the concern about children losing cultural values is not explained clearly. The response also shifts between household chores and childcare without distinguishing which tasks are suitable to delegate. To strengthen the argument, explain when paid help is beneficial and give a specific example, then qualify your view about childcare rather than treating all outside care as harmful.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting contrasting considerations, and a conclusion. Sequencing words such as “Firstly,” “Furthermore,” and “In the conclusion” help readers follow the broad progression. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical, with repeated “Because” and “Therefore,” and some links do not clearly show how one idea follows from another. For example, the claim that hiring help creates employment is followed by the financial burden point without a clear contrast marker or explanation. The conclusion repeats the concern about future generations rather than drawing together both sides. Use clearer topic sentences, connect each supporting reason explicitly to the main claim, and vary linking expressions while avoiding sentence fragments after “Because.”
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “employment,” “unemployment,” “financial burden,” “quality time,” and “relationship.” These choices allow you to discuss both economic and family effects. However, several word choices, collocations, and spelling errors reduce precision, such as “frutiful,” “homecare assistent,” “more worst,” and “loss their cultural values.” Some phrases are also vague or unnatural, including “other for their work” and “sensitive work.” This fits a developing but adequate range: you attempt topic-related language, yet accuracy and natural collocation are inconsistent. Learn common combinations such as “hire domestic help,” “provide employment,” and “form a close bond,” and proofread spelling and word forms.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including conditional structures such as “if people would hire someone…” and clauses explaining consequences. The overall meaning is usually recoverable, but grammatical control is uneven, and several sentence patterns are faulty. Examples include “as well their childrens,” “this method can be became,” “they will unable to make,” and “they should to do.” There are also run-on or incomplete constructions: “Because they can utilize…” and “Because, if anyone arrange…” do not work as independent sentences in this context. Improve control of verb forms, modal patterns, agreement, and sentence boundaries—for example, use “can become,” “will be unable,” and “should do.” Practising accurate complex sentences will make your reasoning easier to follow.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.