Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-02
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
It is sometimes possible to pay somebody to do things you don't want to do, or don't have time to do, for example, household chores or looking after children.
Is this a good way of providing work for others?
Should people do these things themselves?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
In this modern era, Individuals are trying to juggle between lots of stuff at once which make their life harder than it suppose to be. While their time is occupied achieving all those different goals it becomes harder for them get time for daily household task. Now i kind of support the idea of getting outisde help with those task like cleaning, cooking, etc, However, we should draw the line somewhere.
On one hand, I suppport the idea of getting help with chores around the house and other stuff while you are out there dealing with other important work. For instance, sometimes work can be too stressful that you just want to come home and wind off without having to deal with chores. Moreover, There is a whole section of society who make their living offering such services like cleaning, providing pre-cooked meals. So in return this thing does create more jobs.
On the other hand, depending too much on outside help is also not very good idea. for instance, Nowadays it can be seen that some people do not even know how to cook at all which is a basic survival thing. Either these people are eating out or getting precooked meals. Another thiing where i would draw the line is children daycare as while it is a great tool to use and get your kids taken care of. However, people are relying on it too often and not spending time with their kids at all.
To conclude, While it is totally fine to get work done by someone but being too dependent and ignoring certain responsibilities is where it starts to be a problem.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
Your position is clear: you support paying for help with chores, but believe people should retain some responsibilities themselves. You address both questions by explaining that domestic services create jobs and that excessive reliance can leave people without basic cooking skills or reduce time spent with children. These are relevant points, and the examples make your view understandable. However, some ideas are more fully addressed than others: the employment benefit is asserted rather than explained in detail, and the childcare point would benefit from a clearer distinction between necessary care and avoidable over-reliance. To strengthen the response, develop each reason with a specific example and explain more directly when outsourcing is beneficial and when people should do tasks themselves.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a coherent overall structure: an introduction states your position, two body paragraphs present contrasting considerations, and the conclusion restates your main view. The signposts “On one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “To conclude” help readers follow this progression. Some connections are less smooth or precise, however. The childcare sentence beginning “Another thing where I would draw the line” shifts into a fragment-like construction, followed by “However” in a way that interrupts the relationship between the ideas. The conclusion also repeats the general position without drawing together the specific points. Use clearer links between claims and examples, and make sure each paragraph develops one central idea in a deliberate sequence.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use enough vocabulary to communicate the main argument, including relevant expressions such as “juggle,” “outside help,” “depending too much,” and “draw the line.” There are also attempts at less basic phrasing, such as “a whole section of society” and “basic survival thing.” However, several choices are informal, imprecise, or incorrectly formed for an IELTS essay: “lots of stuff,” “wind off,” “pre-cooked meals,” and “other stuff” weaken the academic tone or clarity. Spelling and capitalisation slips, including “outisde,” “thiing,” and inconsistent “i,” also affect control. Aim for more precise collocations and consistent formal wording, while checking spelling carefully.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt a mix of simple and complex forms, including a contrast clause beginning “While” and a reason introduced by “as.” The overall meaning is generally clear, but some grammatical errors recur and occasionally make sentences awkward. For example, “which make their life harder than it suppose to be” has agreement and verb-form problems; “harder for them get time” is missing a grammatical element; and “depending too much on outside help is also not very good idea” needs an article. Sentence boundaries and punctuation also need attention, particularly the long childcare sentence, which combines incomplete and connected clauses. Practise checking subject–verb agreement, articles, and complete clause structure, then divide overloaded sentences into clearer units.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.