Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-12
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some consumers are increasingly choosing to buy goods that are produced in their local area, rather than imported goods.
What are the reasons for this?
Is this a positive or a negative trend?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Lot of people prefer to purchase products and goods that have been produced in their local towns and cities, rather than imported ones. From my perspective, this trend has numerous reasons, such as the lack of trust in international products and could lead at the same time to an increase in the local economy.
First of all, people like buying local products instead of purchasing imported ones because they believe that imported goods have a low quality comparing to local goods.Actually,consumers see that local products which have been made by local materials are trust-worthy because the think that those materials are clean, healthy and do not contain any poisenous substantions.Unlike the imported products which have been made outside of the country with unknown materials.For instance, lots of my neighbours prefer to buy tunisian soda because they think that Coca Cola and Pepsi were made with pork.
As a results,this choise can contribute in an improvement in the local economy and raise the income of the region's factories and markets.In fact,when people buy local products, they encourage factories to produce more goods. As a result, there will more job opportunities and a local financial indepandence.For exemple, citizens in countries with powerful economies like Germany and the united states are mainly consuming local goods which raise job oppurtunities and affect positively their economies.
In summary, the low levels of trust in overseas products push consumers to buy localy-made goods from local markets which can have a positive impact on the region's economy.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
The response addresses both questions: it gives a reason for choosing local goods—distrust of imported products—and judges the trend positively because it may support factories, employment and regional income. The position is clear in the introduction and conclusion, and the examples about neighbours choosing Tunisian soda and local purchasing in Germany and the United States help make the points relevant. However, the reasons are not equally developed: distrust is explained mainly through an unsupported claim about ingredients, while the economic benefits are listed rather than explored in detail. To strengthen the response, explain why consumers may trust local production and show more clearly how increased demand leads to lasting economic benefits, using carefully qualified examples.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction, one paragraph explaining consumer motivation, a second on economic effects, and a concluding summary. Sequencing phrases such as “First of all,” “As a result,” and “In summary” make the progression easy to follow. This coherent arrangement is a strength, although some linking is mechanical or repetitive, particularly the repeated use of “As a result” and “In fact.” The opening sentence also repeats the idea of buying local goods without adding much to the introduction. Some sentence boundaries and spacing make the flow less smooth. Use a wider range of natural transitions, connect cause and effect more explicitly, and ensure each paragraph develops one central point without repeating it.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
The response uses enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate its main ideas, including “imported goods,” “local economy,” “job opportunities,” and “financial independence.” There are also attempts at more specific language, such as “poisonous substances” and “income of the region’s factories and markets.” However, noticeable spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision: “poisenous substantions,” “choise,” “indepandence,” and “oppurtunities” are examples. Some combinations are also unnatural, such as “low quality comparing to local goods” and “raise the income of the region’s factories.” These issues fit a limited but usable range. Build accuracy by checking spelling and learning common collocations, for example “lower quality than” and “increase factory revenue.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
The essay attempts both simple and complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “products which have been made by local materials” and a contrast introduced by “Unlike the imported products.” The main message remains understandable, but errors in sentence construction and punctuation are frequent enough to make some passages less controlled. For example, “From my perspective, this trend has numerous reasons, such as the lack of trust … and could lead” does not maintain a parallel structure, while “there will more job opportunities” is missing a verb. The fragment beginning “Unlike the imported products” should be joined to a complete sentence. Review articles, verb forms, sentence boundaries and parallel phrasing, and proofread spacing after punctuation.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.