Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-16
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some consumers are increasingly choosing to buy goods that are produced in their local area, rather than imported goods.
What are the reasons for this?
Is this a positive or a negative trend?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
In current time period there are many developments in different different factors. Same as in goods factor, now people can also buy goods and product from all across the world by import and export method. But there are some consumers who still choosing to buy goods from local area. In this essay I would discuss about positive and negative points before drawing logical conclusion.
Importing goods from other country is becoming a trend in our country. But , in many cases people have to face several issues regarding delivery. In case delivery is on perfect date and sometime consumers have to face problems regarding working stage . Importing goods from other country is very costly then buying from local areas. After giving negative points , positive points would not be neglected. Some people choosing to buy products from local areas which is also time saving method. Because if you import anything from other country it will take several days to be delivered so it is easy to buy product from local area.
Secondly , buying products from local area will be less expensive than compared to imported product , also if consumer have any kind of problem they could easily exchange them from local shops. To make this more clear I want to give you an relevant example. Previous year I bought an expensive LED lamp from high standard. That lamp was imported from other country and gives luxury vibe, But after few days that lamp start sparking from edges. I visited showroom and complaint about this, they said that is non refundable and I lost my 10,000 rupees.
In conclusion, although in my opinion buying goods from local production area is a positive trend yet they are easy to deliver and under consumers budget.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The student addresses all parts of the task by identifying reasons for buying local goods and discussing whether this trend is positive or negative. The position is stated early on, although the phrasing in the introduction is somewhat simplistic. Ideas are supported with relevant explanations and a personal example regarding an LED lamp purchase. However, some arguments lack full extension and the discussion tends to blend the reasons and the evaluation together rather than separating them clearly. Overall, the task response meets the requirements for a Band 6.0, as it addresses the prompt adequately, though the development of ideas remains slightly underdeveloped.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The text is generally coherent with an overall logical arrangement, moving from an introduction to body paragraphs discussing reasons and examples, and finishing with a brief conclusion. Paragraphing is attempted, though paragraph boundaries and transitions could be managed more effectively. Cohesive devices are used, but sometimes mechanically or awkwardly, such as 'Secondly' and 'To make this more clear'. Referencing is occasionally unclear, as seen in the conclusion where 'yet they are easy to deliver' uses a confusing conjunction. There is some repetition in how ideas are linked. This places the response firmly at Band 5.5 to 6.0; cohesion is sometimes faulty and mechanical, matching the Band 6 descriptor.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The lexical resource is adequate for the task, but contains noticeable limitations and errors in word choice and collocation. Phrases such as 'different different factors', 'goods factor', and 'working stage' are unnatural. The student attempts less common vocabulary ('import and export method', 'non refundable'), but inaccuracies in collocation persist, such as 'complaint about this' instead of 'complained about this'. Spelling and word-choice errors occur frequently ('current time period', 'sometime' instead of 'sometimes'), but they do not severely impede communication. This corresponds directly to the Band 5.0 descriptors, where vocabulary is minimally adequate with noticeable errors.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but control over grammar and punctuation is inconsistent. There are frequent grammatical errors, including missing articles ('In current time period'), incorrect verb tenses ('that lamp start sparking'), subject-verb agreement issues ('consumers ... has to face'), and preposition errors ('from other country'). Punctuation is also faulty, with unnecessary spaces before commas ('But ,') and frequent run-on tendencies. Although communication is not completely obscured, the high frequency of errors across various structures places this submission at a Band 5.0 level, as frequent errors cause some difficulty for the reader.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.