Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays famous people are photographed by professional photographers everywhere they go. Some people say this is a good thing because the public are interested in their lives. Other people think that photographers are wrong to follow famous people.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It is a highly contentious issue whether celebrities should be given privacy or not. Since these days their each and every steps are traced by media. Therefore, few individuals opine that it helps them to gain publicity and keeps fan following interested in their lives whereas others say that it interrupts their privacy and cause them to feel pressurized to maintain a specific kind of social image. This essay will present both the viewpoints before framing a logical conclusion in the end.

On compelling argument in a favor of supporting media to follow famous people everywhere is that it allows them to do promotion of their films or series especially when they captured during special events and occasions. Moreover, people are fascinated by their daily routines and takes inspiration from them. For instance, if celebrities are constantly shown for their fitness and health and captured by media outside their gyms or workout spots people who follows them are more likely to go to the gym and practices exercise daily. As a result, it puts positive impact on the public.

Despite these arguments, people who are against this trend believes that celbrities also have personal life therefore it is imperative to respect their privacy regardless of their position and status.However, when they constantly followed by media everywhere they feel pressure to maintain a specific image in front of the public and cannot fully enjoy their lives personally. For instance, if their personal lives such as whom they are dating revealed to the public can put negative impact on their mental health which they want to keep private leads them to feel frustration and lack of control of their lives. Consequently, this puts negative impact on their mental health and overall well being.

In conclusion, although there are many benefits of media capturing them everywhere as it keeps audience engaged to them yet I believe excessive following disrupt their mental peace and privacy.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address both views and give a clear opinion: the first body paragraph explains how media attention can promote celebrities and inspire fans, while the second argues that constant coverage harms privacy and mental health. The examples about fitness and revealing a celebrity’s relationships make the discussion relevant. Your conclusion also states that the harm of excessive following outweighs its benefits. This meets the task well, but the two sides are not developed equally: the benefits are mainly illustrated through promotion and exercise, while the privacy argument could explain more specifically why public interest does not justify intrusive photography. To strengthen the response, develop that distinction and make your own position explicit earlier, rather than leaving it chiefly to the conclusion.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay has a clear overall progression, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Linking expressions such as “Moreover,” “Despite these arguments,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the discussion, and the examples generally appear beside the ideas they support. This is a strong organisational foundation. Some connections are less smooth, however: “Therefore” does not clearly follow the opening sentence, and the introduction’s promise to present both views before a conclusion is somewhat formulaic. The final sentence of the privacy paragraph also repeats the point about negative effects on mental health. Use referencing and transitions more precisely, and avoid restating an idea when a further consequence or explanation would advance the argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

You use a suitable range of topic vocabulary, including “publicity,” “privacy,” “social image,” “daily routines,” and “mental health.” These choices allow you to discuss both public interest and the personal costs of media attention, and the meaning is generally clear. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “imperative to respect their privacy,” though some combinations are not natural: “gain publicity,” “keeps fan following interested,” and “puts positive impact” would benefit from more idiomatic wording. Spelling errors such as “celbrities” also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise collocations and check spelling; a few well-chosen natural phrases will be more effective than formal-sounding expressions that do not fit their context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including conditional examples beginning “if” and clauses explaining consequences. This gives the essay some structural variety, and the main ideas remain understandable. However, errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction recur. For example, “their each and every steps are traced” has problems with possessive order and plural agreement; “people who follows them” should use a plural verb; and “when they constantly followed by media” is missing an auxiliary. The sentence beginning “if their personal lives … revealed” also needs a complete grammatical structure. Review subject–verb agreement and ensure every subordinate clause has a clear subject and verb. More accurate control of these patterns would make your complex sentences easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.