Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays famous people are photographed by professional photographers everywhere they go. Some people say this is a good thing because the public are interested in their lives. Other people think that photographers are wrong to follow famous people.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is a fact that nowadays celebrities are followed by press photographers everywhere. Some consider it as a good thing as general public wants to know about them, I believe these photographers should not be following these famous people. This essay will discuss aspects of both the views.

To begin with one of the main reasons is public curiosity. This is because fans are naturally invested in entertainment industry and want to know about lives of their favorite celebrity. As a result, professional photographers follow these well known to click their pictures and make videos in order to meet public interest. For example, candid pictures of the actors and singers provide relatable glimpse in their everyday routine lives and fashion choices. This demontrates why these media people tend to follow them.

On the other hand, it is important to consider an important factor that is invasion of privacy and safety hazards. To further explain, celebrities deserve a basic right to have a private life away from cameras like a normal human being. Consequently, constant tracking and publish pictures of their families can expose them to safety threats. For instance, publishing photos of celebrity families can put them in risk of being stalked and followed by stalkers. Therefore, famous people and their family members cannot relax and have a peacefull life.

In conclusion, although media attention is part of fame and public curiosity, I believe safety is

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You discuss both perspectives and state a clear view: “I believe these photographers should not be following these famous people.” The privacy and safety argument is relevant, and the example about family members being exposed to stalking helps explain your position. However, the public-interest side is less fully developed: curiosity and interest in celebrities’ routines are mentioned, but the essay does not explore why this interest might justify photographers’ work. Your conclusion is also incomplete, ending with “I believe safety is” rather than finishing the opinion. The response is 14 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to develop both sides and complete the conclusion. Extend the explanation and provide a complete final judgement.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a concluding paragraph. Sequencing phrases such as “To begin with,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” make the progression easy to follow. Within the body paragraphs, examples generally follow the relevant claims. However, some linking is mechanical, particularly the repeated use of “This is because,” “As a result,” and “Therefore.” The final paragraph is cut off, so the essay does not reach a complete resolution. Also, “these well known” has an unclear reference, making the sentence harder to follow. Use a wider range of natural links, clarify references, and ensure the conclusion completes the argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “public curiosity,” “invasion of privacy,” “safety hazards,” and “candid pictures.” These expressions help communicate the main arguments, and the meaning is generally clear. There are also some inaccurate or awkward choices: “relatable glimpse” would be more natural as “a glimpse into,” while “tracking and publish pictures” does not express the intended actions accurately. Spelling slips such as “demontrates” and “peacefull” also reduce precision. Aim for more natural collocations and check spelling carefully. For example, you could describe photographers as “pursuing celebrities” and say that publication “exposes families to risks,” rather than relying on less precise phrasing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a reason clause in “This is because fans are naturally invested…” and a conditional-style explanation beginning “Consequently.” Most sentences communicate the intended meaning, but some grammatical errors remain. In the opening, the comma splice joins two independent clauses: “Some consider it as a good thing…, I believe…”; use a full stop or a conjunction. “Constant tracking and publish pictures” also has faulty parallel structure; use “constant tracking and publishing pictures.” In “follow these well known,” a noun is missing after the adjective. The final sentence is incomplete, which leaves the conclusion grammatically unfinished. Proofread sentence boundaries and check that coordinated forms match.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.