Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-08-26
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Nowadays famous people are photographed by professional photographers everywhere they go. Some people say this is a good thing because the public are interested in their lives. Other people think that photographers are wrong to follow famous people.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 7.0)
In today's world, it is increasingly common that famous people are photographed by experienced photographers wherever they go. While some proponents believe that it is a good thing as people are keen to learn more about their personal lives, others contend that photographers violate their privacy with constant scrutiny. This essay will outline both perspectives in detail and argue that photographers need to adhere to ethical standards when photographing famous personalities.
One of the primary reasons why people believe that it is beneficial to photograph famous personalities is that it creates an emotional connection between fans and their favourite actors. This is largely because youngsters nowadays shape their lifestyles and goals according to the behaviour of their famous personalities. If their favourite actors contribute to performing good deeds, they would be likely to follow in their footsteps. As a result, gaining a glimpse into their favourite models' personal lives encourages individuals to become responsible citizens, thereby strengthening their emotional connection with their famous people. For example, Bollywood actress Anushka Sharma, who has a huge fan following, has influenced many youngsters through her commitment to her religious life. Consequently, her personal lifestyle is frequently covered by the paparazzi. Hence, this example shows why people believe it is advantageous to photograph famous personalities.
On the contrary, people who believe it is not best practice to be followed by photographers argue that it leads to undue stress and anxiety. This is because when actors want to come out of their homes to get fresh air away from their professional life, they are constantly covered by paparazzi without their consent. These actions performed by media reporters not only affect their mental well-being but also create misinterpretations of their random pictures in the media industry. For this reason, celebrities often hesitate to come in front of paparazzi because those random pictures captured by reporters might spread false information about their lifestyle. To exemplify, Bollywood actor Salman Khan faced a huge downturn in his career due to false information spread by media reporters related to animal killing. Therefore, it is evident that photographers need to get consent before photographing famous personalities.
In conclusion, although it is advantageous for famous personalities to be photographed by experienced photographers, I believe these professional photographers need to follow ethical practices when photographing famous personalities.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 7.0 |
| Overall | 7.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.5
The response addresses all parts of the prompt, discussing both views and providing a clear personal opinion. The ideas are well-developed, particularly the arguments regarding the influence of celebrities on youth and the negative impact of paparazzi on mental health. The examples provided, such as the mention of Anushka Sharma and Salman Khan, are relevant and support the arguments effectively. The position is consistent throughout the essay, and the conclusion clearly synthesizes the main points while reiterating the writer's stance on ethical standards. The response is well-structured and meets the requirements of the task fully.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5
The essay demonstrates a logical progression of ideas. Each paragraph has a clear central topic, and the transition between the two viewpoints is smooth. Cohesive devices such as 'On the contrary', 'Consequently', and 'For this reason' are used effectively to link sentences and ideas. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. The flow of information is natural, and the reader can easily follow the writer's line of reasoning. There is no evidence of mechanical or repetitive use of linking words, indicating a high level of control over the structure of the essay.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.5
The vocabulary is sufficient and appropriate for the task. The writer uses a range of topic-specific terms such as 'scrutiny', 'undue stress', 'ethical standards', and 'paparazzi' correctly. There is a good attempt at using less common lexical items, and the collocation is generally natural. While there are no major errors in word choice that impede communication, the range could be slightly more sophisticated to reach the highest band. Overall, the lexical resource is flexible and precise enough to convey the intended meaning clearly and effectively throughout the response.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 7.0
The essay displays a good variety of complex sentence structures, such as the use of conditional clauses ('If their favourite actors contribute...') and subordinate clauses ('While some proponents believe...'). The majority of sentences are error-free, and the grammar is generally accurate. There are occasional minor slips, such as 'come in front of paparazzi' (which should be 'in front of the paparazzi') and 'famous people' (which is slightly repetitive), but these do not impede communication. Punctuation is used correctly throughout, and the control over grammatical structures is consistent and reliable.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.