Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-09-29
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Nowadays famous people are photographed by professional photographers everywhere they go. Some people say this is a good thing because the public are interested in their lives. Other people think that photographers are wrong to follow famous people.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Renowned personalities are captured everywhere they go by professional photographers. There is a section of people who believe that this is a best way to show their lifestyle with people who are interested in them, whereas, others argue that. keeping both sides of arguements into consideration, I feel that their living style should not be revealed publically. This Essay intends to discuss the reasons for both views.
To commence with, by socializing the habits of famous people, many individual learn positive attitude from them. To explain, most of the personalities help in the social wellbeing from which natives can get are influenced. As a result, economic benefits can be seen. For To cite an example, a famous Indian personality, named Diljit Dosanjh donates some of the percentage of his income to needy people. It has motivated a local public to donate to poor people. Therefore, by photographing artists every moment can be a positive impact on society.
On the other hand, there are some reasons that behind famous people should not be a publicised everywhere. The predominant is that they youngsters follow their luxurios lifestyle as a role model. This is because young generation are keen interested in trending fashion to gain attention from surroundings. Consequently, they star try to match their fashion sense with with the famous people and they starts wasting money. For example, in trendy outfits of international singers which are very costly are copied by youth. This phenomenon is a totally wastage of money.
Overall, although, be well known personalities have impacted influenced in a h younger individuals from their fashion to buy expensive stother stuff while some personalities have pushed a percentage of people to do something for their economy.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
The response addresses all parts of the prompt by discussing both views—that photographing famous people is beneficial because the public is interested, and that it is wrong—while also providing a personal opinion. However, the introduction is slightly cut off at the end of the second sentence ("whereas, others argue that. keeping both sides..."), which impacts the initial clarity of the stance. Ideas are presented and supported with examples, such as the mention of the Indian singer Diljit Dosanjh donating a percentage of his income, and the discussion of youth copying expensive outfits. While the development in the body paragraphs is somewhat repetitive and contains minor logical leaps, the main parts of the task are appropriately addressed, aligning comfortably with Band 6.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with a clear paragraph structure, using standard signposting phrases such as "To commence with" and "On the other hand". However, cohesion is occasionally faulty or mechanical. For instance, the transition in the conclusion ("Overall, although, be well known personalities have impacted influenced...") is disjointed and difficult to follow. Referencing is also occasionally unclear, such as the dangling phrases in the third paragraph ("The predominant is that they youngsters follow..."). Paragraphing is used sufficiently to separate distinct ideas, but the flow of sentences within paragraphs is occasionally disrupted by grammatical errors.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common items such as "renowned personalities", "social wellbeing", and "luxurios lifestyle". However, there are numerous word choice, spelling, and collocation errors throughout the response, including "publically" instead of "publicly", "luxurios" instead of "luxurious", and "stother stuff" in the conclusion. Furthermore, awkward phrasing such as "socializing the habits" and "local public" limits the precision of the writing. These errors do not entirely impede communication, but they restrict the lexical score to Band 5.5.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, such as conditional and relative structures ("whose are very costly are copied by youth"). However, frequent grammatical and mechanical errors occur throughout the text. Examples include fragment sentences and unfinished thoughts in the introduction, subject-verb agreement issues ("many individual learn"), incorrect prepositions and determiners ("reasons that behind famous people"), and messy phrasing in the conclusion. While some error-free sentences do exist, the frequency of errors is high enough to cause occasional difficulty and distraction for the reader, placing this submission firmly at Band 5.0.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.