Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-03
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Nowadays famous people are photographed by professional photographers everywhere they go. Some people say this is a good thing because the public are interested in their lives. Other people think that photographers are wrong to follow famous people.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
It is undeniable that popular celebrities got clicked by professional photographers wherever they go. Some individuals believe it is a positive action because of the interest of their audience. While others believe it is a negative action performed by the photographers. While both views has valid arguements. I firmly believe that celeraties also have a personal life and no one has the right to enter in that personal space. This essay will discuss both aspects before drawing a reasoned conclusion.
To begin with, one of the most significant reasons why individuals believe that it is a good thing because of thier wants to become like them in future. A considerable proportion of individuals has developed keen interest and huge liking towars their favourite celebrity. Sebsequently they wants to know about every single detail about them. For instance, many people has choosen their hero or ideal from famous persons and they want to follow them in their real life.it will make them better person.
Furthermore, another significant reason why people think thtat it is a negative avtion due to the fact that it is of paramount importance for individual to have a private space which they do not want to share with anyone else. It is inappropriate for others to follow them everyevery and vanish their personal life.
In conclusion, While those who support that famous personalities should get clicked anywhere believe its is a positive action because of curiosity and wants to become alike them in future. Their are others who believe it is a negative action by the photographers because they hamper their personal space and that is inappropriate. I firmly believe that photographers should maintain some basic sence and not to cross their limits.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
The response addresses the prompt by discussing both views on paparazzi and offering a personal opinion. However, the ideas remain limited and under-developed, which keeps the task achievement at this level. For instance, the argument about people wanting to become like celebrities is introduced in the second paragraph, such as in the sentence 'many people has choosen their hero or ideal from famous persons', but this point is not fully extended or supported with convincing elaboration. Similarly, the counter-argument regarding privacy is mentioned rather briefly in the third paragraph without exploring deeper nuances of the issue. A clear position is presented in the introduction and conclusion, but the overall development of ideas requires more depth and relevant supporting examples to reach higher standards.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
There is some clear organisation with a logical paragraph structure, including an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, overall progression is limited by mechanical and faulty cohesive devices. For example, sentences are sometimes awkwardly linked or fragmented, such as starting a sentence with 'While both views has valid arguements. I firmly believe...' which disrupts the flow between clauses. Referencing is also occasionally unclear, and transitions between paragraphs feel abrupt rather than smoothly guided. Paragraphing is used sufficiently to separate the main ideas, but the relationships between sentences lack the flexibility and clear logical progression seen at higher bands.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is limited but minimally adequate for the task. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary, but this leads to noticeable errors and inaccuracies in word choice, collocation, and spelling that occasionally cause difficulty for the reader. Examples of lexical issues include 'got clicked', 'arguements', 'celeraties', 'towars', 'Sebsequently', 'choosen', 'thtat', 'avtion', 'everyevery', 'vanish', and 'sence'. While the meaning can generally be deciphered, the high frequency of spelling and word-form errors demonstrates that the lexical range is constrained and lacks the precision required for more advanced bands.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The writer employs a limited range of sentence structures, relying heavily on basic patterns with occasional attempts at complex forms that are frequently faulty. There are persistent errors in subject-verb agreement, verb forms, and punctuation throughout the text. Examples include 'popular celebrities got clicked', 'While both views has valid arguements', 'individuals has developed', 'individuals has choosen', and sentence fragments like 'it will make them better person.' These frequent errors in grammar and punctuation can cause some difficulty for the reader and prevent the response from achieving a higher band.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.