Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays famous people are photographed by professional photographers everywhere they go. Some people say this is a good thing because the public are interested in their lives. Other people think that photographers are wrong to follow famous people.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

In this contemporary era, the social media is trending largely as the society is continuously investing to know about lives of their favourite stars. Therefore, a section of society considers that it is accurate that the celebrities are being clicked and followed by media but rest of the individuals negate this practice. This matter need to be debated in light of various enegnders along with my own standpoint, which are expounded in this essay.

According to the advocates of the former theory, the first and foremost benefit of stars being clicked is that it will create employment prospects. To be explicit, the photographers who snap the famous perosnalities, like singers and actors, get an opportunity to earn while working with media channels and making them grow. Besides this, the stars definitely get more love of their followers if they give insight of their personal lives through pictures and vedios. To exemplify, actors these days are treated as God in india by few emotional and hard core fans and they have sense of social interaction whenever their favourite actor tends to show his personal life by photographs and social media appearances, which further expand their popularity.

However, opponents have their separate views. Primarily, continuous chase by the photographers sometimes lead to breach of privacy of the celebrities. To substantiate, the prominent figures certainly have life beyond their social appearance as well as responsibility towards their family, so when they are clicked unnecessarily or in some vulnerable situations it amounts to interference in their lives, which is definitely illegal. The second worth mentioning negative aspect of famous people being papped is that it increases the probability of crime committed against such persons. For instance, as per an article published in 'Inidan Express' on crime against the VIPs, the details of personal life, schedules and choices of such persons being shared by media through pictures and news articles is one of the major reasons of growing crime against celebrities, which gives opportunity and accessibility to the criminals to attack them.

In my viewpoint, the practice of unregulated clicking of celebrities needs to be handled by the authorities in order to maintain the sanctity of the society as well as the privacy of the famous people and mimimise the chaos being created in result.

To encapsulate, even though capturing of stars by media shots is beneficial in growing the fame and social image of such individuals but its drawback including invasion of their privacy and increasing rate of illegal acts against them cannot be completely ignored. I consider that this practice must be dealt for the society at large.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You discuss both perspectives and give a clear final view: the benefits include employment and increased popularity, while the opposing case focuses on privacy and safety. The examples about fans’ interest and criminals using personal information help make the discussion relevant. This meets the task well, and your position against unregulated photography is apparent, especially in the fourth paragraph. However, the employment point is only briefly explained, and the claim that photographs give celebrities “more love” could be developed more precisely. Your conclusion also repeats the main drawbacks rather than fully clarifying how public interest should be balanced with privacy. More even development and a consistently explicit position would strengthen the response further.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, your opinion, and a conclusion. Ideas generally progress logically, and signposting such as “However,” “To substantiate,” and “To encapsulate” helps readers follow the argument. This organisation is effective, though some linking phrases feel formulaic or are used where a direct connection would be clearer. For example, “According to the advocates of the former theory” makes the reader work to identify the view being discussed, and the final paragraph largely repeats points already made. Some references, such as “this practice,” could also be more specific. Use simpler transitions where appropriate and make each paragraph’s central point and its connection to your position more explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a broad range of vocabulary, including “breach of privacy,” “vulnerable situations,” “prominent figures,” and “probability of crime,” which suits the topic. However, inaccurate word choice, collocation, and spelling are noticeable and sometimes make the meaning less natural. Examples include “the social media is trending largely,” “enegnders,” “media shots,” and “mimimise.” Phrases such as “treated as God” and “grow their popularity” also sound imprecise in this context. These issues keep the vocabulary from being consistently clear and appropriately controlled, despite your willingness to use less common expressions. Prioritise accurate, natural combinations over ornate phrasing, and proofread spelling and word forms carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including subordinate clauses and cause-and-effect structures, as in “when they are clicked unnecessarily … it amounts to interference.” Most of the argument remains understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. For example, “This matter need to be debated” has a subject–verb agreement error, while “continuous chase … sometimes lead” also needs agreement. There are article and number issues in “the society” and “their favourite stars,” and the long sentence beginning “To exemplify” is difficult to control. Work on agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries, especially in longer sentences. Breaking some complex sentences into two would improve accuracy without reducing range.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.