Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-18

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays famous people are photographed by professional photographers everywhere they go. Some people say this is a good thing because the public are interested in their lives. Other people think that photographers are wrong to follow famous people.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 7.0)

These days prominent personalities are photographed by paparazzis everywhere they go. Some individuals feel that it is a great thing if public takes interest in their lives, while others argue that following celebrities is not a good thing. Although capturing celebrities can help public to understand their lifestyles, I believe that renowned people suffer from lack of privacy.

Clicking pictures of popular people can help public to know about their standard of living. This is a useful thing to know because some celebrities act as a role model for general population, and knowing about their way of living is crucial for general public so that they can follow them accordingly. For instance, in India, majority of people view Virat Kohli as their role model, so having updates regarding his life is vital for his fans. However, I believe photographers should not follow famous people as they have a right to live independentely.

On the other hand, following celebrities everywhere can result in breaching the right to privacy. Many well-known people want their own space, and they do not want to share everything with media, so the constant exposure to media can spoil their mental well-being. This would not only result in significant distress in their lives but also develop guilt if some confidential information is leaked. For instance, Virat Kohli and Anushka Sharma have decided to settle in London because they want to live a private life. I believe taking pictures of well-known personalities is awful because they have a right to live a life without media influence.

To conclude, while constant filming or following famous people can inform public about the events in their favourite stars' life, it takes their right to live a private life. I believe photographers should not follow prominent personalities.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address both views and make your own position clear: the first body paragraph explains why the public may want information about celebrities, while the second argues that constant pursuit harms privacy and well-being. The examples of Virat Kohli and Anushka Sharma make the discussion relevant. However, the public-interest argument is less fully developed: the claim that fans need to know celebrities’ lifestyles so they can follow them is asserted rather than examined, and it does not distinguish ordinary reporting from intrusive pursuit. Your position is clear, but the discussion would be more complete if you explained where public curiosity should end and why.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay has a clear overall progression, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion that restates your opinion. Linking phrases such as “Although,” “On the other hand,” and “To conclude” help readers follow the argument, and the examples are placed alongside the relevant points. Some connections could be more precise: the first body paragraph moves from the value of celebrity updates to your objection to photographers without fully explaining the contrast. The conclusion also repeats the privacy point rather than drawing together the two views. Develop the relationship between each claim and its supporting explanation to make the progression more seamless.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “prominent personalities,” “role model,” “right to privacy,” “constant exposure,” and “mental well-being.” These choices communicate the main ideas, and some less common expressions show an effort to vary your language. However, several phrases are imprecise or unnatural, such as “paparazzis,” “follow them accordingly,” and “develop guilt if some confidential information is leaked.” Repetition of “famous people,” “public,” and “life” also limits flexibility. Aim for more natural collocations and precise wording, especially when describing the effects of media attention; this would make the argument sound more fluent and controlled.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 7.0

You use a mix of simple and complex structures, including the concessive opening “Although capturing celebrities can help…” and the conditional explanation beginning “This would not only result…”. Many sentences are clear and grammatically controlled, and punctuation generally supports the meaning. Some errors remain in articles, agreement, and sentence construction. For example, “if public takes interest” needs an article before “public,” and “some celebrities act as a role model” has a number mismatch. The sentence beginning “This would not only result…” also has an unclear relationship between its two outcomes. Review article use and singular/plural agreement, and make sure longer sentences express parallel, clearly connected ideas.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.