Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-20

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays famous people are photographed by professional photographers everywhere they go. Some people say this is a good thing because the public are interested in their lives. Other people think that photographers are wrong to follow famous people.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

There is a growing discussion regarding the celebrities being chased by the paparazzi for the pictures. Many people believe this is acceptable because public is curious about celebrity's lifestyle, while others believe that constant tracking is unethical intrusion in their personal life.

On one hand, there are clear reasons why proponents support media coverage for celebrities. First of all, general public is genuinely curious about the lifestyles, daily routine and fashion choices of their famous celebrities . Especially, youngsters are often influenced and tend to follow them. Reading news and articles provide entertainment for millions of people. Moreover, this media attention can actually help the celebrities can get more work and projects. As they are regularly posted in magazines and various social websites, they can get opportunities to work for different film houses.

On the other hand, some people believe that chasing celebrities for photographs is totally wrong. The main is that everyone, including famous people has right to privacy. Being chased by paparazzi every time can cause severe anxiety, stress and loss of personal space. Furthermore, it can also cause dangerous situations. For example, chasing fast cars for clicking pictures can put both photographer and famous person in physical danger.

In conclusion, While I understand that people are interested in lives of famous individuals, however, I believe that the personal life should be respected. The paparazzi should only be allowed at public events, famous people should also be allowed to enjoy their personal life without any disturbance.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address both views and give a clear opinion: public interest and possible career benefits are weighed against privacy and safety, and your conclusion supports protecting celebrities’ private lives. The examples about young people following celebrities and dangerous car chases are relevant. However, the two sides are not developed equally: the claim that media attention brings celebrities more work is asserted rather than explained, and the public-interest argument could distinguish entertainment from a genuine need to know. Your position is clear, but the conclusion’s proposed limit—photographers only at public events—would benefit from a brief justification. The response is two words below the required minimum, so add a little relevant development rather than padding.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response has a clear four-paragraph structure, with separate paragraphs for each view and a conclusion that returns to your position. Sequencing is easy to follow, and signposts such as “On one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” make the progression explicit. This is a strong overall organisation. To make cohesion more flexible and less formulaic, connect some ideas through explanation rather than relying mainly on paragraph-opening markers. For example, explain how public interest leads to entertainment or career opportunities, then link that reasoning to the opposing concern about privacy. The conclusion also uses “While” and “however” together, which makes the relationship between its clauses awkward; choose one contrast structure.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

You use a relevant range of vocabulary, including “paparazzi,” “intrusion,” “anxiety,” “personal space,” and “opportunities,” and the meaning remains clear throughout. There are also attempts at more specific expressions, such as “daily routine” and “fashion choices.” Some word choices and collocations are not fully natural, however: “constant tracking” and “for clicking pictures” could be expressed more idiomatically, while “film houses” is imprecise in this context. “The main is that” also appears to be an incomplete or mistaken phrase. Greater precision in these combinations would strengthen the response; aim to use familiar collocations accurately rather than reaching for wording that sounds formal but is unclear.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex forms, including a contrast clause beginning “While I understand…” and a conditional-style example about chasing cars. Most sentences communicate the intended meaning, but some errors in agreement, articles, and sentence construction remain. For instance, “public is curious” needs an article or plural subject, and “everyone … has right to privacy” needs an article before “right.” The sentence “this media attention can actually help the celebrities can get more work” combines incompatible verb patterns; use either “help celebrities get” or “enable celebrities to get.” In the conclusion, “While …, however” creates a faulty contrast structure. Proofread for these patterns and practise varied complex sentences with accurate clause links.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.