Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-26

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays famous people are photographed by professional photographers everywhere they go. Some people say this is a good thing because the public are interested in their lives. Other people think that photographers are wrong to follow famous people.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

in these days , famous people such as actars, singers and sport players are photographed everywhere they go. Where some individual believe that photographing is a good thing which give publicity to famous people. while, other think photographers should give private time to well know personalties. i will discuss both views in up coming paragraphs as we as give my opinion on this.

on the one hand, withot a doubt photographed to popular individuals give more publicity and there followers can follow them by there posted picture . there fans have imformation from there pictures how they spend there timer, where they travel as well as they know what the eat . photographers help public to get this imformation from newspapaer, magazines, and social media. for example , fans enjoy seeing pictures of their favorite actor while attend evend and spendinf time with othe celebrities. moreover, these photographs can help people beacome more popular and promote their work.

on the other hand , famous people also have a right for their privacy. they may feel uncomfortable when such photographs follow them everywhere,espcially they are spending their time with family and friends. Sometime photographs take pictures without there permision, which cause stress and effect their personal lives. for instance, now a days photographs take picture of female actors from there back and post on social media which create trolling that female actoress that spoil her reputation, and distroy here privacy. famous people should be able to enjoy there lives without any distruption .

i my opinion, photographs should allow to take pictures on public events such as moive promtion, concerts and award shows. hoever, they should not follow them eveywhere and disturb their privacy . being famous doest not mean lose their personal lives.

i conclusion, although photographs help individuals to become popular and get publicty but aslo disturb their personal lives. therefor photographs should respect personal boundries while doing ther jobs.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address both sides of the discussion and make your own position clear: photographers can take pictures at public events, but should not follow celebrities everywhere. The two body paragraphs give relevant reasons, including fans’ interest in celebrities’ activities and the effect of intrusive photography on family life and privacy. The example about female actors also supports your concern, although its meaning is difficult to follow and could be explained more clearly. Some points are asserted rather than fully developed—for example, how publicity promotes a celebrity’s work, or why public interest justifies photographing them. To strengthen the response, explain these links and make the examples more precise while maintaining the balanced discussion already present.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, your opinion, and a conclusion. Signposts such as “on the one hand,” “on the other hand,” and “in my opinion” help readers follow the argument. This logical arrangement is a strength. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear, and several ideas run together within long sentences. For instance, the sequence about fans learning “how they spend their timer, where they travel” would be easier to follow if divided and linked more precisely. The conclusion repeats the main contrast but does not add much synthesis. Use referencing carefully, and build clearer links between each reason, its explanation, and its example.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “publicity,” “privacy,” “personal lives,” “social media,” and “disruption,” and you attempt more specific expressions such as “personal boundaries.” However, the range and control are limited by frequent spelling errors and inaccurate word choices, including “actars,” “personalties,” “imformation,” and “promtion.” Some phrases are also unnatural or unclear, such as “photographed to popular individuals” and “create trolling that female actoress that spoil her reputation.” These errors sometimes make the intended meaning difficult to understand. Build a reliable set of topic vocabulary and check spelling and collocations carefully; prefer clear, accurate phrasing over complicated expressions.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a contrast with “although” and a conditional-style point about celebrities’ privacy. However, control is inconsistent, and errors in sentence structure, agreement, articles, and punctuation often make sentences difficult to read. For example, “photographing is a good thing which give publicity” has an agreement error, while “Sometime photographs take pictures … which cause stress” contains problems with number and clause agreement. Several sentences also join multiple ideas without clear punctuation. Practise forming accurate subject–verb patterns and separating related points into complete sentences. More reliable control of these basics, alongside your attempts at complex structures, would make the argument much clearer.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.