Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-27

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays famous people are photographed by professional photographers everywhere they go. Some people say this is a good thing because the public are interested in their lives. Other people think that photographers are wrong to follow famous people.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The celebrities are always surrounded by the photographers to capture the photograph of them. Many believes that they are invading their privacy however others found it interesting to know what their idols doing. In my opinion, every individual has to respect the privacy any person and that also included the famous people hence no photographers should allowed to take photographs without their permission.

From a fans' perspective, knowing your idol helps to shape their lives. Like many fans were inspired by the kind gesture of their favorite celeb in public. For example, if any celebrity, were photograph during its public appearance and asked the photographers if they had a dinner or not and if not he/she ask organiser to arrange it for them as well. This small event make those fan wittier and caring for others.

Being in the public life is difficult as you are always been watched by cameras. Everyone deserve to live their lives privatly. In addition, when you are captured with all your activity, you would feel presured to represnt yourself well mannered which could not be easy for all the time. Some photographers chase the celeb, during their vacation while they travel with their children which should not be acceptable.

In the recent times, the prince Henry were upset beeing keep following by the photographers after he declares that he do not want to perfom a royal responsibilities. He moved in the Canada on their private island however the photographers rent a boat and try to take their pictures with his family. That should not be tolarated.

In a conclusion, famous person's life is not easy as compare to normal person, they are always under the microscope and critisized on their choices. When the photographer took overlook their privacy and took photos that should be not allowed hence following them is not right.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You discuss both perspectives and make your own position clear: you acknowledge that fans may be inspired by celebrities’ actions, while arguing that photographers should respect their privacy. The examples about a celebrity arranging dinner for others and Prince Harry being followed help make the discussion relevant. However, the first viewpoint is less fully explained: the response focuses on how fans can learn from a celebrity’s kindness, rather than clearly explaining why the public’s interest in their private lives makes constant photography beneficial. Some supporting details are also unclear, particularly the dinner example. To strengthen the response, explain each side more directly and develop the examples so their connection to the argument is unmistakable.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: it introduces the issue and your opinion, presents the fans’ perspective, then develops the privacy argument with a further example before concluding. Paragraphing helps distinguish these stages, and linking expressions such as “In addition” and “In a conclusion” guide the reader. However, progression within some paragraphs is less smooth. The dinner example is difficult to follow, and the shift from the general privacy argument to the Prince Harry example could be connected more explicitly. Some references, including “they” and “that,” are not always immediately clear. Use clearer topic sentences and make the relationship between each example and its main point explicit; vary the linking language rather than relying on formulaic transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of vocabulary for the topic, including “invading their privacy,” “public appearance,” “under the microscope,” and “criticised on their choices.” These phrases show an attempt to discuss the issue beyond basic terms. However, inaccurate word choice, collocation, and spelling are noticeable and sometimes make the meaning less precise. For example, “wittier” does not convey the intended idea of becoming more considerate, while “took overlook their privacy” is not a natural expression. There are also misspellings such as “privatly,” “presured,” and “tolarated.” Build accuracy by checking word forms and spelling, and learn common collocations such as “respect someone’s privacy” and “be followed by photographers.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a contrast with “however” and a conditional example beginning “if any celebrity…”. The main argument remains understandable, but grammatical control is inconsistent, and errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction sometimes make the reader work to interpret the point. Examples include “Many believes,” “Everyone deserve,” and “no photographers should allowed.” The long conditional sentence about arranging dinner is especially difficult to follow because its clauses and verb forms are not controlled. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement and modal constructions, and divide long examples into shorter sentences. More reliable control of these structures would make your ideas clearer while preserving variety.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.