Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-10-30
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Nowadays famous people are photographed by professional photographers everywhere they go. Some people say this is a good thing because the public are interested in their lives. Other people think that photographers are wrong to follow famous people.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
In the contemporary era, celebrities are becoming more famous and,a media is always trying to click the photographs of them. There is an ongoing debate regarding taking photographs of them. There are divided opinions. Some proponents believes that It is really cool thing because all are interested in their life. However, some counterclaimed that and say it is absolutely wrong to follow the famous people all the time. Prior to my preference, both the viewpoints would be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs with valid reasons and appropriate examples.
Discussing the former view, some supporters thinks that it is a beneficial, because in the modern era, some superstars are a role model for the whole young generation.They follow what they follow and doing what they are doing in their day time. For instance, Because of a beautiful actress named shilpa shetty, a paprazzi always try to catch a picture of her body figure, it insired a lot of youngster to do healthy exercise like a yoga. Furthermore, taking a picture of them might be beneficial because they feel extreme joyous and lucky to see the crowd. If they are getting more famous then and only they will get a good film and work.
Discussing the later view, some opponents believes that it is completely unethical to follow the famous people. Scrutinising the facts from grassroots level, the foremost one is that It will ruin their freedom and their privacy. To illustrate, a famous cricketer name Virat Kohli having India's top most followers aroung the world. He is so charming, but he shifted to the London, UK. The reason behind it is that he did not get any privacy in India when he goes out anywhere. Moreover, clicking their pictures when they are not ready for it is really detrimental because it is really intrusive and sometimes it will spread a false information as well. For examples, Two superstars are seen together and they clicked picture together, then public are making the affair rumours about them.
Based on the aforementioned reasoning, I believe in later view of this argument. They should have a choice of freedom and privacy. In my opinion, a media should not take a photographs wherever they go, they should not be like that. They should respect their privacy at every possible way.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both views and state a clear preference for protecting celebrities’ privacy, particularly in the conclusion. The discussion is relevant: the example of Shilpa Shetty illustrates public interest in celebrities, while Virat Kohli’s move to London supports the argument about intrusion. However, the two sides are not developed equally. The claim that photographers make celebrities feel “extreme joyous and lucky to see the crowd” is unclear and does not convincingly explain why following them is beneficial. The point that publicity may help celebrities obtain work is also asserted rather than explained. To strengthen the response, clarify the public-interest argument and develop each example with a more direct link to the view it supports.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion that makes your position clear. Signposting such as “Discussing the former view” and “Discussing the later view” helps readers follow the structure, and examples generally appear alongside the relevant arguments. This meets the lower-band expectation of clear organisation and shows some of the flexibility associated with stronger cohesion. However, several transitions feel mechanical, and some references are unclear—for example, “They follow what they follow” does not identify who “they” refers to or what is being followed. The opening also promises that both views will be discussed “in the upcoming paragraphs,” which is formulaic. Use clearer links between claims and examples, and vary transitions so the progression feels more natural.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “privacy,” “intrusive,” “role model,” and “detrimental,” and you attempt more formal expressions such as “Scrutinising the facts from grassroots level.” This gives you enough language to discuss both sides, but inaccurate word choice, collocation, and spelling are noticeable and sometimes make ideas less clear. Examples include “counterclaimed,” “extreme joyous,” “paprazzi,” and “insired”; “a beautiful actress” also does not express the intended point about her influence. Some phrases sound unnatural or overly elaborate rather than precise. Aim for accurate, natural combinations of words and check spelling carefully. Choosing straightforward expressions such as “supporters argue” or “inspired young people” would make your reasoning clearer and more convincing.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional and subordinate clauses, as in “If they are getting more famous then and only they will get a good film and work.” The overall meaning is usually recoverable, but errors in agreement, articles, verb forms, and sentence construction occur across the response. For example, “some proponents believes” and “some opponents believes” do not match the plural subjects, while “a media” and “a photographs” use articles incorrectly. The sentence beginning “For instance, Because of…” also has faulty punctuation and capitalisation, and “a famous cricketer name Virat Kohli having…” lacks a complete grammatical structure. Practise building accurate sentences first, then add complex clauses; check subject–verb agreement, articles, and complete verb phrases during revision.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.