Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-03
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Nowadays famous people are photographed by professional photographers everywhere they go. Some people say this is a good thing because the public are interested in their lives. Other people think that photographers are wrong to follow famous people.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
In recent times, expert cameraman starts clicking pictures of well known personality at every location they visit. According to some masses this is a new popular trend and demand of today's people to know about their internal life happening whereas other consider this as an unnecessary thing. I also believe in the latter view and consider it as unlawful to capture someone personal lives and make it public.
On the hand, photographers are meeting the demand of the public interest. Individuals want to gets updated regarding their favourite personality life and daily activities. Moreover, many fan followers gets inspired and perform same task in their own life. For instant, in multiple surveys it is observed that citizens follow and gets easily influenced from the appeal of their famous actor or role model instead of their teacher or parents. Thus, capturing and sharing good moments of these famous people will instil motivation in their followers.
On the other hand, photo clicking trend hinder on the personal life of these celebrities as everything about their internal life readily available in public domain. In addition, anyone can manipulate their personal photographs with the help of artificial intelligence and manage to defame or create chaos in their life.
For example, multiple incidents and complaints has been registered over past few months were well known individual photo or videos are being altered and surfaces over media moreover, in some cases amount is also demanded to delete the photo from media. Hence, everyone has right to privacy and it should be respected.
To recapitulate, I also believe in latter view that everyones privacy right should be respected and photographers should not upload or share anyone photo without their consent.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
You address both perspectives and state your own view clearly: you explain public interest in celebrities’ lives, then argue that privacy should be respected. The discussion is relevant, and the example of altered images and demands for payment supports your concern about harm. This meets the task well overall. However, the two sides are not developed equally: the public-interest paragraph relies on a broad claim that fans are inspired by celebrities, with limited explanation of why photographing them everywhere is justified. The example about surveys is also general rather than specific. To strengthen the response, explain the public’s interest more precisely and develop how it might be balanced against celebrities’ privacy, while keeping your position consistent.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion that restates your position. The contrast between “On the hand” and “On the other hand” helps readers follow the discussion, and the ideas generally progress from public interest to privacy risks. Some linking is mechanical, however, and a few connections are unclear. For example, “For instant” introduces an example, but the survey claim does not clearly demonstrate that photographing celebrities benefits the public. The long sentence beginning “For example, multiple incidents…” also combines several points without clear boundaries. Use more precise transitions and divide complex explanations into sentences so each example’s relevance is explicit.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “public interest,” “personal life,” “artificial intelligence,” “defame,” and “privacy.” These choices allow you to discuss both the appeal of celebrity coverage and its potential harms. You also attempt less common expressions, but some are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “internal life,” “fan followers,” “photo clicking trend,” and “surfaces over media.” These collocation and word-choice problems sometimes make the argument less precise, even though the main meaning remains understandable. Aim for natural combinations such as “private lives,” “fans,” “celebrity photography,” and “circulates online.” More precise vocabulary would help distinguish legitimate reporting from intrusive pursuit.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “whereas,” “as,” and “that,” and your main ideas are generally understandable. However, errors in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence construction remain noticeable. Examples include “cameraman starts,” “want to gets,” “surveys it is observed,” and “incidents and complaints has been registered.” The sentence beginning “For example” also runs several ideas together, making its structure difficult to control. These issues limit accuracy despite your attempts at longer structures. Check subject–verb agreement and verb forms, and use shorter sentences when presenting examples; for instance, separate the altered-image incidents from the demands for payment.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.