Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 19 · 2026-11-04

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Nowadays famous people are photographed by professional photographers everywhere they go. Some people say this is a good thing because the public are interested in their lives. Other people think that photographers are wrong to follow famous people.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

In a contemporary era, most of the renowned individuals are captured by professional cameramen, particularly while travelling. While some people believe that it is a great news for the fans to get access to their personal information,whereas others believe photographing or following them without their consent is violation to their personal space and privacy. I firmly believe everyone has the right to keep their personal life upto them until they are comfortable sharing it.

On the one hand, supporters of the former argue that fans should know each and every details about their popular person because they are emotionally attached, and care for their achievements and failures. In addition to that, famous people are role model and source of inspiration to a lot of youngsters. Young people watch their daily routine habits, like, what they eat, wear, and how they maintain themeselves with a healthy lifestyle, so they can imitate and get popular like them.

On the other hand, proponents contend that following famous personalities and taking their photographs destroy their personal space, and creates breach in their privacy. Travelling becomes challenging for them, as their each and every move is watched or captured, which makes it harder for them to even come out of their homes. Popular people have families too, and they also have right to enjoy their life with their friend and families happily without any stress. For instance, photographers capture celebrities, and spread their information of travelling to all the news channel and social media, making it difficult for them to enjoy peacefully.

From my perspective, we need to respect everyone's privacy and their personal choices. Although it's a good way of showing love to them by keeping their each information, but sometimes overpossessiveness stress them out too much.

Therefore, I believe activities of famous people should only be captured with their permission, maintaining their space and privacy.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion7.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address both perspectives and make your own position clear: the opening and conclusion argue that public figures’ privacy should be respected unless they consent. The reasons are relevant, including fans’ interest in role models and the pressure of being followed, and the example of travel details being shared on social media supports the privacy argument. This meets the task well, but the two sides are not developed equally. The benefits of celebrity coverage are explained mainly through imitation of routines, without considering other reasons the public may value such coverage; the example on the opposing side is also quite general. To strengthen the response further, explain the limits of public interest and distinguish respectful reporting from intrusive pursuit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay has a clear overall progression: an introduction presents the debate and your view, separate body paragraphs discuss each side, and the conclusion restates your position. Signposting such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “From my perspective” makes the structure easy to follow. Ideas within paragraphs generally develop in a sensible order, moving from fans’ attachment to role-model influence, and then from privacy invasion to its effects on travel and family life. Some links are less smooth: “Although it’s a good way … but” combines two contrasting linkers, and the final paragraph repeats the privacy position without adding much. Use transitions more selectively and connect examples more explicitly to the point they illustrate.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “renowned individuals,” “emotionally attached,” “source of inspiration,” “personal space,” and “breach in their privacy.” These choices help communicate the debate, and the meaning remains clear despite some imprecise or unnatural expressions. For example, “a great news,” “each and every details,” “maintain themselves with a healthy lifestyle,” and “overpossessiveness stress them out” show that less common wording is not always controlled in collocation or form. Spelling errors such as “upto” and “themeselves” also reduce accuracy. Aim for natural, precise combinations rather than elaborate phrasing—for instance, “a source of inspiration” and “intrusive media attention”—and proofread spelling and word forms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including a concessive opening with “While” and a reason clause beginning “as.” Most sentences communicate the intended meaning, but some grammatical errors remain and occasionally make the phrasing awkward. In the first sentence, “While … whereas” uses two competing contrast structures; “photographing or following them … is violation” needs an article, and “their each and every move” has an incorrect determiner pattern. There are also agreement problems in “famous people are role model” and “following … and taking … destroy … and creates.” Practise checking subject–verb agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries, especially in longer sentences. Separating the opening contrast into two clauses would improve control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.