Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-08-01
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The first table below shows changes in the total population of New York City from 1800 to 2000. The second and third tables show changes in the population of the five districts of the city (Manhattan, Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, Staten Island) over the same period.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
ked at approximately
tained the dominant position.
lowest
hed its lowest point at
med out at
ded the
ined the
The table illustrate that the changes in
all population of New yorp city in [redacted phone]. The second and third chart illust
describe alter in the number of
people in five districts of the City.
in the same period. The date is
calobrated in percentage.
In the over all, The pouplation of new
york in 2000 is on the highest peak
beside the to citizenation in
1800 is on lowest peak.
On the one hand, In the year 1800
the people in New your is on lowest
value (79,216). It increase sligly
in 1900 to (3,437,202. Addionaly
in 2000 it was on the the
highest point at 8,009,185. @more
over in Manhattan in 1800 the
number of public is on bottomed out
at 60,515 (76%) in 1900 it climbed
ed geoup edged up 1,850,093(54%).
and the time period 2000 it was
1,538,096 (19%).
On the other hand, The distristicts
Brooklyn, Bronx, queens, Staten Island
In g. period 1800 the number of
public is 18701 on the lowest
lowest
reached its lowest point at
bottomed out at
recorded the lowest figure
remained the least common category
peak 18,701 (24%). It showed
a modest growth in 1900 the year
of 1900 to 1582,109 (46%). In the
period 2000 it peak at approximately
6,471,089 (81%).
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response attempts to address the task by summarizing population data, but it fails to provide a clear overview of the main trends. While it mentions the total population and some district figures, the information is fragmented and lacks a coherent comparison between the districts. The inclusion of extraneous text (the list of phrases at the beginning and end) suggests a lack of focus. The data is presented, but the analysis is superficial and does not effectively highlight the most significant changes or differences between the five districts over the two-century period.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay lacks a logical flow. The inclusion of random phrases at the beginning and end of the text disrupts the structure. While there is an attempt at paragraphing, the progression of ideas is disjointed. Cohesive devices are used, but they are often misused or placed awkwardly, such as 'On the one hand' and 'On the other hand,' which do not logically connect the data provided. The referencing is sometimes unclear, making it difficult for the reader to follow the comparison between the districts.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is limited and often inaccurate. There are frequent errors in word choice, such as 'citizenation' instead of 'population' and 'public' used to refer to population numbers. The student attempts to use some academic vocabulary like 'calibrated' and 'modest growth,' but these are often used incorrectly or in inappropriate contexts. Spelling errors are frequent (e.g., 'yorp,' 'sligly,' 'distristicts'), which occasionally makes the meaning difficult to discern.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The response relies on a mix of simple and attempted complex sentence structures, but the accuracy is very low. There are persistent errors in subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'The table illustrate'), article usage, and tense consistency. Punctuation is also problematic, with random capitalization and incorrect placement of parentheses. These frequent errors often impede communication, as the reader must struggle to interpret the intended meaning of the sentences.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.

