Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-05
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
It is clearly evident from the statement that availability to clean water is everyone right and human should have the liberty to access it. Water which is provided through government is free of cost beacuse it is basic human rights.
This essay will explore both views and ideas and will be ellucidated ahead in the forthcoming paragraph with logical reasoning.
To commence with, there are lot laws and rights give to humans by God. Water is one of that so, every person is completely allow to access it through many ways such as clean water which is very crucial for people life because it is basic need of every person. To explain with, every oragan in body needs water to work properly and maintain the body nutrition level. Resultantly, in this world the availability of water is not short but the access to clean water is challenging. According to the researcher of Cambridge University, there are many people suffering from water problem in everyday life.
By contarary, the need of water in every home is basic like we need water not just to drink but to do lot of household things such as washing, cooking, and cleaning for something. To demonstrate with this access is free of charge for everyone to use in daily life. According to the investigation of Greenwhich University, it results that there is 51% which is waste in daily life through people.
In conclusion as far as i am concerned that government should take care of everyone rights. Government should take care of the clean water availability specially to those areas where water level is very low .
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
You express a relevant position in the conclusion, saying the government should ensure clean-water availability, especially in areas with low water levels. You also give related reasons, including water’s role in bodily health and its use for cooking, washing, and cleaning. However, the response only partially answers the central question of whether every household’s supply should be free: it does not clearly distinguish free access to a basic amount from charging for high or wasteful use, and the position is not consistently stated throughout. Several points, such as the claim that water is not scarce and the unexplained 51% figure, are unclear or insufficiently supported. Develop a clear agree/disagree position and explain how each example supports it.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. The body paragraphs broadly group ideas about water as a human need and its household uses. However, there is no clear progression from the opening to a sustained argument: the introduction promises to explore “both views,” although the task asks for your position, and the conclusion does not resolve the discussion in a fully explicit way. Linking phrases such as “To commence with,” “By contrary,” and “To demonstrate with” are either awkward or do not clearly show the relationship between ideas. Some references, including “it results that there is 51%,” are difficult to follow. Use simpler, accurate transitions and make each paragraph develop one clear point.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use some vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “availability,” “access,” “basic need,” and “household,” and you attempt more formal expressions. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, which sometimes makes the meaning difficult to understand. Examples include “availability to clean water,” “everyone right,” “completely allow to access it,” and “water problem.” Spelling errors such as “beacuse,” “ellucidated,” “oragan,” “contarary,” and “Greenwhich” also reduce accuracy. Aim for natural, precise phrases rather than elaborate formulaic wording; for example, describe people as having “the right to clean water” and refer to “water shortages” or “limited access to safe water.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and longer sentence forms, and the overall meaning can usually be followed. However, the range is limited, and complex sentences are often faulty. Errors in agreement, articles, and sentence construction appear in examples such as “there are lot laws,” “every person is completely allow,” and “every oragan in body needs water.” The opening also contains an unclear construction: “Water which is provided through government is free of cost beacuse it is basic human rights.” Punctuation and capitalisation are inconsistent, particularly in the final sentence. Practise building accurate subject–verb patterns and shorter sentences first, then combine ideas using clauses such as “because” or “although” only when the relationship is clear.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.