Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The availability of fresh and clean water is considered as a fundamental human right, therfore it must be given to the people for free. I strongly agree to the idea that clean water should be supplied free of cost, maintaing the infrastructure required to transport the clean water at door steps.

According to the United Nations, more than 50% of people has no access to clean water. Almost in all third world countries, a large number of people are forced to drink dirty water because their governments are not providing suffecient funds to clean the water. This funding is required to buy distilation plants and managing pipelines for transportation. A huge sum of people can not afford to maintain such expensive infrastructure personally.

In the first world the governaments are making sure that every individual has access to the clean water. Additionally, some governaments are supporting finacialy to their people like giving them loans to get distilation plants. Escavation cites, responcible for the transport of water by pipeline are not only monitered but also made eco friendly by replacing steel pipes with plastic ones. Cost related issues are not a big problem in developed countries.

One problem to provide clean water to every part of the country is, some villages do not have direct access to the cities. A number of rivers, mountains or deserts may separate them from central areas. To make sure clean water reaches at these remote areas costs governments a lot. The conditions get worse when there is no natural water available, for example in middle eastern countries the provesion of clean water is a major problem.

So, it's concluded that supply of clean water is major challange but it must be accomplished by the governments, as it is the basic human right.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the opening: you strongly agree that clean water should be supplied free of charge, and the conclusion returns to the idea that it is a basic right. You give relevant reasons, including affordability, the cost of infrastructure, and the difficulty of serving remote communities. These points address the question, but the discussion is uneven: the paragraph about developed countries focuses on government support and infrastructure rather than explaining why household water should be free, and the claim that more than half of people lack access is not connected clearly to free provision. To strengthen the response, explain more directly how free household supply would address these problems and develop one or two examples in greater depth.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate body paragraphs and a conclusion. The progression from unequal access, to developed-country provision, to remote-area challenges is generally understandable, and phrases such as “Additionally” and “So” help signal connections. However, some links between ideas are not fully clear: the discussion of loans for distillation plants and replacing steel pipes with plastic does not explicitly support the central argument about free water. The paragraph transitions also feel somewhat list-like, and “In the first world” shifts the focus without a clear comparison to the previous paragraph. Make each paragraph’s main point explicit and use linking phrases to show how its evidence supports your position.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “fundamental human right,” “infrastructure,” “pipelines,” and “remote areas,” which helps communicate the subject. There are also attempts at more specific terms, such as “distillation plants” and “eco friendly.” However, spelling errors are noticeable throughout, including “therfore,” “suffecient,” “governaments,” and “provesion,” and several expressions are imprecise or unnatural, such as “a huge sum of people” and “at door steps.” These issues reduce the accuracy and naturalness of the vocabulary, even though the main meaning is usually recoverable. Check spelling carefully and learn common collocations for discussing public services, costs and access.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including a relative clause in “villages do not have direct access to the cities” and a reason clause beginning “because.” Most ideas remain understandable, but grammatical errors recur. For example, “more than 50% of people has” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “the availability … is considered as” uses an unnecessary preposition. The opening sentence also joins ideas awkwardly, and “One problem … is, some villages” has incorrect punctuation between the subject and its explanation. Review agreement, articles and sentence boundaries, and practise building complex sentences with accurate clause structure. More consistently controlled sentences would make your argument easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.