Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It ia argued that access to clean water is a fundamental human right and that every household should recieve it free of charge. I completely agree with this because water is essential for survival and charging for it unfairly harms the poor.

Firstly water is not luxury but it is a basic need like air. Without water people cannot drink ,cook or maintain hygiene. When water is expensive poor people not able to afford this therefore poor families forced to drink dirty water which the affect the human health. They suffer from cholera and diarrhea which are chronic disease. For example, in many parts of Pakistan, childern sick simply because they do not afford clean water. Providing free water would protect public health and human lives.

Secondly, free water would reduce inequality in society. Wealthy people can easily afford for bottled water, but poor people should not suffer just because they are poor. If government provide the basic amount of water for free to every home, everyone will have equal chance to live healthy life. However, this does not mean unlimited water for usage. Fuethermore, to prevent water waste governments should provide free, fixed amount of water and extra charge for over use. This will encourage the people to use the water caferfully because they know that it is a basic need of human life.

In conclusion, because clean water is essential for life and health, i believe that every home should have a basic supply provided free of charge , with charge applied only excessive use.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.5

Your position is clear from the introduction: you completely agree that households should receive clean water without charge. You address the main reasons—survival and health, and reducing inequality—and support them with relevant explanation, including the example of children in Pakistan. The qualification that a basic amount should be free while excessive use is charged also adds a practical dimension and is consistent with your view. This is a well-focused response with ideas extended and supported. To make the argument more fully developed, explain more precisely how the proposed free supply would be funded or managed, and clarify the public-health example rather than relying on a broad claim about children becoming ill. The conclusion effectively restates your position and qualification.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response has a clear overall progression: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs present separate reasons, and the conclusion summarises your position. Sequencing signals such as “Firstly,” “Secondly,” and “In conclusion” make the structure easy to follow, while “However” introduces the important limit on free provision. The ideas within each paragraph generally develop in a logical order. Some linking is less smooth, however: “Furthermore” follows the qualification about unlimited use without clearly showing how the next point relates, and the shift from bottled water to equal access could be connected more explicitly. Aim to use a wider variety of natural links and clearer references between sentences, rather than relying mainly on basic signposting.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use adequate vocabulary to discuss the topic, including relevant terms such as “fundamental human right,” “public health,” “inequality,” and “excessive use.” These choices help communicate your position and show some range beyond basic everyday language. However, several spelling errors and imprecise or unnatural expressions reduce accuracy, for example “recieve,” “childern,” “caferfully,” and “water is not luxury.” Phrases such as “equal chance to live healthy life” and “extra charge for over use” also need more natural wording. Build precision by checking spelling and learning common collocations for public services and health. More accurate use of topic-specific vocabulary would make the argument sound more fluent and controlled.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including conditional sentences such as “If government provide the basic amount…” and a concession in “However, this does not mean unlimited water for usage.” The overall meaning remains understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. Examples include missing articles in “water is not luxury” and “live healthy life,” incorrect verb forms in “poor people not able to afford” and “If government provide,” and agreement or number problems in “They suffer from cholera and diarrhea which are chronic disease.” Sentence boundaries and punctuation also need attention, as in “Without water people cannot drink ,cook…” To improve, check articles, subject–verb agreement, plural forms, and punctuation, while continuing to practise complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.