Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

According to the United Nation, every citizen has a right to life. This means that every person should get what is essential for its survival and water is the most vital element of it. I totally agree, that every person should get access to the clean water for drinking and daily use.

In the world, where half of the population is living under the poverty line specially in the third world states so if they are even charge also against the clean water, it will highly unfair to them. Bigger families, having large usage of the water make them pay alot of money as already they are burdened by the taxes and inflation.

I have witnessed poor people, which are unable to pay for clean water uses water from rivers which have polluted water as industrial waste is dump into that. As a result, health issues, children disability cases and deads are being report daily bases.

I believe that international institution like United nation must have to play a povital role, by making the Governments bound to develop the mechanisms and policies, to provide the clean water to every home in their state.

Overall, I beleive that water is an important element of survival, without it people cant survive. The global institution should pass the resolution on it for the health and pro

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you agree that households should receive clean water without charge, and you give relevant reasons, including the financial pressure on poorer families and the health risks of polluted river water. These examples show an understanding of the issue. However, the response addresses the task only partially because the reasons are asserted rather than fully explained, and the final point about international institutions does not clarify how free provision would be funded or implemented. The conclusion is also cut off at “for the health and pro…”, leaving the final idea incomplete. The response is 27 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to develop your argument. Add explanation and a complete, specific conclusion.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, supporting paragraphs, a proposed role for international institutions, and a concluding paragraph. The progression from affordability to health consequences is generally understandable, and phrases such as “As a result” help show cause and effect. However, the overall development is limited, and some connections are unclear. For example, the sentence beginning “In the world, where half of the population…” is difficult to follow, while the shift from household costs to international institutions is not fully explained. The conclusion repeats the survival point and then ends mid-sentence. Use clearer topic sentences, connect each paragraph explicitly to your position, and ensure the final paragraph completes the argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “poverty line,” “industrial waste,” “health issues,” and “policies,” so the reader can follow your main concerns. There are also attempts at more formal language, such as “international institution” and “resolution.” However, the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation, and spelling errors make parts of the response awkward or unclear: “third world states,” “pay alot of money,” “deads,” and “povital role.” Some phrases are also imprecise, such as “clean water for drinking and daily use.” Aim for accurate, natural combinations and check spelling carefully. More precise terms for affordability, public provision, and water contamination would help express your ideas more effectively.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a conditional structure in “if they are even charge also against the clean water…” and a relative clause in “people, which are unable to pay…”. However, complex sentences are often faulty, and errors occur frequently enough to make some ideas difficult to interpret. Examples include “every person should get what is essential for its survival,” “families… make them pay,” and “children disability cases… are being report.” Articles, agreement, verb forms, and sentence boundaries also need attention. The final sentence is incomplete, and the opening paragraph contains an unnecessary comma after “agree.” Practise building accurate sentences with one main idea, then add subordinate clauses only when you can control their grammar.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.