Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Clean water is the requirement of every individual and household, moreover, access to it is a basic human right. I strongly agree about the argument that every home should have a water supply that is provided to the individuals free of charge. I will discuss the advantages like political influence, prevention of diseases and more control over the hospital usages.

Supporting the individuals residing in the country has a substantial impact on the overall smooth and fair responsiblities of both the political body and the residents. Access to clean and free water reduce the stress among citizens which has low income, because of the burdens of other utlity bills like electricity, which consume a large portion of their income. For instance, a citizen can boost the economy of the country when he does not have to worry about the low payouts and less stress and more likely to support the political body.

Ensuring clean water supply can safeguard the citizens and reduce diseases like cholera and other water borne diseases. It can also reduce the burden on the healthcare systems. For instance, when citizens are forced to pay high prices for clean water, they will look up for lower prices or poorly sanitized water(contaminated water) and end up with more water-borne diseases such as typhoid.

Water is not only for consumption but also essential for the hygiene and sanitation of their environment and their houses.

In conclusion, i strongly believe that water should be availabe to each and every individual free of cost. Access to clean water is the basic human necessity, and making it free not only protect the population from varous diseases but s

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction and conclusion: you strongly support free access to clean water. You give relevant reasons, including reducing financial pressure on low-income households and preventing water-borne illness, and the examples of cholera and typhoid help explain the health argument. However, the political point is less fully developed: the link between lower household costs, economic contribution and support for political bodies is difficult to follow. The introduction also promises discussion of “more control over the hospital usages,” but this idea is not clearly addressed in the body. Develop each reason with a direct explanation of how free provision would work and why it supports your position; complete the cut-off final sentence as well.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion, and the health paragraph follows a clear cause-and-effect sequence from high water prices to unsafe alternatives and illness. Some connections, however, are mechanical or unclear. The opening uses “moreover” to join two closely related claims, while “For instance” introduces a political example whose connection to the preceding point is not made explicit. The first body paragraph also combines household financial pressure with economic and political effects, so its progression is hard to track. Use clearer topic sentences and explain each link between claims. The conclusion begins appropriately, but its final sentence is unfinished, which disrupts the ending.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “basic human right,” “water-borne diseases,” “contaminated water,” and “healthcare systems,” which helps communicate the main ideas. There is also some attempt at more formal wording, such as “substantial impact” and “safeguard.” However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, including “political influence,” “smooth and fair responsibilities,” “hospital usages,” and “look up for lower prices.” Spelling errors such as “responsiblities,” “utlity,” and “availabe” also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise, natural phrases—for example, describe reducing pressure on household budgets or healthcare services—and check spelling and word forms carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional structure in “when citizens are forced to pay high prices … they will look up for lower prices” and a relative clause in “citizens which has low income.” The main message is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors affect accuracy. For example, “Access … reduce” needs subject–verb agreement, and “citizens which has” has problems with both the relative pronoun and agreement. The opening sentence also joins independent ideas with a comma, and the final sentence is incomplete. Review agreement, relative clauses, sentence boundaries and punctuation, then proofread each sentence to ensure that its structure is complete.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.