Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Water plays an important role in daily activities, such as drinking, cleaning, and washing. Therefore, every household should be provided with a free supply of water because access to safe drinking water is an essential human right. I completely agree with tis statement because water is basic need for every human to survive in this world. Firstly, safe drinking water is essential for a good human health and prevent different diseases. If people do not have access of clean healthy water, they may suffer from serious disease. For example people who live in poor areas they use dirty waters from small ponds and lakes in their area and they face severe stomach infections and other disease. Secondly, free water supply can help different poor families financially in rural areas to get access of clean water, because many people can not afford high paying water bills due to their low income .If the government provides basic water facilities free of cost, then these families can easily meet their daily need. Therefore, people get good health in poor areas because of healthy water and may not suffer from severe diseases. In conclusion, I strongly agree with that every household have access to free water for their best health and better quality of life. the government should take the responsibility to providing this basic facility to everyone.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear from the introduction (“I completely agree”) and conclusion, and both body paragraphs give relevant reasons: health protection and financial access for poorer families. The examples of people using pond or lake water and facing infections help illustrate the health argument. However, these points are brief and partly repetitive, especially the repeated link between clean water and avoiding disease; the financial argument also needs a specific example or fuller explanation. The response does not meet the stated 250-word minimum, which limits how fully you develop the ideas. To strengthen the response, explain how free provision would work and address a possible concern, such as the cost to governments or the need to prevent waste.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs organised by reason, and a conclusion. Sequencing words such as “Firstly,” “Secondly,” and “In conclusion” make the progression easy to follow. However, cohesion is somewhat mechanical, and links between ideas are not always smooth. For example, “Therefore” repeats the preceding cause-and-effect relationship in the first body paragraph, while the second paragraph returns to the health point rather than extending its financial focus. Some references, such as “these families,” are understandable but could be connected more precisely to the preceding explanation. Use a wider range of linking methods and ensure each paragraph develops one main idea in a clear sequence.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “safe drinking water,” “water bills,” “low income,” and “stomach infections.” These phrases show awareness of the subject and help make your position clear. However, the range is limited and several word-choice or collocation errors make the writing less natural, such as “good human health,” “dirty waters,” and “high paying water bills.” There are also spelling and form errors, including “tis” and “disease” where a plural is needed. Aim to learn common word partnerships and vary repeated terms such as “water,” “people,” and “diseases.” More precise vocabulary would make your arguments clearer and more persuasive.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple sentences and longer conditional structures, as in “If the government provides basic water facilities free of cost, then these families can easily meet their daily need.” This gives the response some structural variety, and the main message remains understandable. However, errors in agreement, articles, verb forms, and sentence boundaries occur throughout. Examples include “water is basic need,” “every household have access,” and “the government should take the responsibility to providing.” The opening sentence of the first body paragraph also combines an adjective with a verb form incorrectly: “essential for a good human health and prevent.” Review subject–verb agreement, article use, and parallel structure, then proofread each sentence to correct these patterns.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.