Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Human beings roamed the earth for almost 5 million years. And since the existence of humans water was one of the most important thing for their survival. As civilization became more advanced the access to water became more and more easier, which made our daily lives easier.

In developed countries, People has more access to clean water at their homes that the developing countries. Eventhough the developed countries give a water access to their citizens they require the people to pay some amount of money for it. Some reports show that in the united states and the united kingdom two of the most developed countries in the world charge a high amount of money for water bills. The citizens of these two countries was seen to make protests for the high charge of water bills in the past decade. Although, the water bill charges are used to improve the infrastructures used to provide the water access but its believed it doesn't account to the income the citizens are getting. If the cost of the water access if free of charge it will definitely affect the service the people get because fixing the infrastructure costs a lot of money, and through time the quality of water will definitely deteriorate and even stop.

So, I believe as every citizen needs a clean access to their homes, they need to pay for that service they are getting. and the government needs to modernize its technology and system so that the cost of the water bill will be minimized that the people can afford.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you disagree with free household water and argue that users should pay to maintain the service. You also give a relevant reason, explaining that infrastructure repairs are costly and that free provision could lead to declining water quality. However, the response only partly develops the task. The opening historical comments do not directly support your argument, and the claims about high bills and protests in the United States and United Kingdom are not explained with specific evidence or examples. The final point about modernising technology is useful but brief. To strengthen the response, address the human-rights aspect directly and explain how affordable charges or support for low-income households could balance access with maintenance costs.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph about water charges and infrastructure, and a concluding position. The central argument can be followed, particularly the link between paying for water and funding repairs. However, progression is limited because the opening history is not clearly connected to the argument, and the main paragraph combines several claims without developing them in a clear sequence. Some linking expressions are awkward or repetitive, such as “Although” before a sentence that does not complete a contrast, and “So” at the start of the conclusion. Improve cohesion by organising each paragraph around one main point, using clear references to connect supporting explanations, and making the relationship between claims explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “infrastructure,” “water bills,” “citizens,” and “quality of water.” However, the range is limited and several phrases are imprecise or unnatural, which sometimes makes the argument harder to read. For example, “more and more easier” is not a natural comparative, “water access” is repeated where “water supply” or “access to clean water” would be clearer, and “account to the income” does not express the intended relationship accurately. There are also spelling and capitalisation slips, including “Eventhough” and “united states.” Build a more precise range of collocations for costs, public services, and affordability, and check spelling and word forms carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including a conditional explanation of what might happen if water were free. However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently enough to affect clarity. Examples include “water was one of the most important thing,” “People has,” and “the citizens … was seen,” where agreement or number is incorrect. The sentence beginning “Although, the water bill charges…” is not formed correctly, and the conditional “If the cost … if free of charge it will…” contains an incorrect verb form and an unclear structure. Sentence boundaries and punctuation also need attention, including the fragment-like opening “And since the existence of humans…” Practise accurate agreement, conditional forms, and complete sentence construction before adding more complex clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.