Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In modern times, Clean water has become a essential part in everybody life. it is argued that, clean water is a basic hume right and government should provided charge free in water supply. I completely agree with this idea.

Generally speking, there are several reasons that pure water is need people for daily life. One of the possible reason that health problem. Because poor people do not need to pay for clean water and they use it in regular life. In every year many people are affected on several water diesese for feeding and using harmful water in daily life. Another reason is that boost economy. For instance, if government supply clean water for every category people than human are working with a good health. People save their time for searching free water in varites area.

Furthermore, another reasons is that improves living standard. Because, if government supply free water supply then people are living easily with their family and they do not thinking about water charge. For building a wealth citizen country government need to help human which is using in daily life and serve it for free for quality of life. In additon, People get extra help for their save time and they do not find free water tube. People give increased their work quality in daily life.

In conclusion, clean water has became a complex issue with no easy solutions. Government or authorites need supply free water for their daily life and people maintain health and wealth with due to free water.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear from the introduction: “I completely agree,” and the response gives relevant reasons concerning health, the economy and living standards. These points show an understanding of the topic, but they are mostly asserted rather than explained or supported with specific examples. For instance, the claim that free water would “boost economy” is followed by a general statement about people working in good health, without showing how this benefit would arise. The discussion also does not consider what providing water free of charge would mean in practice or address a possible counterargument. The conclusion repeats your position, although calling the issue one “with no easy solutions” introduces an idea that is not developed. Develop fewer points with clearer explanations and examples to make the response more complete and persuasive.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. The ideas are grouped broadly by topic, and signposts such as “Generally speaking,” “Furthermore” and “In conclusion” help show the intended stages of the argument. However, progression within the paragraphs is often unclear because several claims are placed together without explaining their relationship. For example, the health point moves from poor people not paying to people being affected by water-related illness, but the connection is difficult to follow. Linking phrases such as “Because” are sometimes used to begin incomplete or awkwardly connected explanations, and “another reason” is repeated. Organise each body paragraph around one main claim, then explain and illustrate it in a clear sequence; use referencing and transitions more precisely.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “clean water,” “health,” “economy,” “living standard” and “quality of life,” so the reader can identify the main subject and your intended arguments. However, the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation and spelling errors make parts of the response difficult to understand. Examples include “water diesese,” “varites area,” “wealth citizen country” and “free water tube.” Phrases such as “boost economy” and “people give increased their work quality” also do not express the intended meaning naturally. Aim to learn common combinations such as “improve public health,” “support economic productivity” and “raise living standards.” Proofread spelling and choose precise words rather than repeating “free water” and “daily life” throughout.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, including conditional forms such as “if government supply clean water … then people are living easily.” However, the range is limited, and errors in sentence construction and basic grammar occur frequently enough to make some relationships hard to follow. For example, “clean water has become a essential part in everybody life” has problems with articles and possessive form, while “government should provided” uses an incorrect verb form. Other examples include “people do not thinking” and “government … need supply,” where the verb patterns are faulty. Some sentences beginning with “Because” are fragments or are not clearly attached to the preceding idea. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement, articles, verb forms and complete sentence structures before adding more complex clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.