Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Clean water is a right for every people and it should be free of charge in every homes. to a great extent, i agree with the statment because it is an essential part of people daily lives.

one of the main reason is that it has an important and basic need for indivisual daily routin. majority of works in homes are can not do without help of water such as bathing, cooking and other many works. moreover, clean water has crucial role in people healthy life. many people are effected by non-clear water and it prevent their life in danger. for example, many roadside families are drinking which negativaly effect their health and became a reason of death. So, clean and free water is a right of every indivisual.

however, free of charge water also have some disadvantages. majority of people wasteing water after use which can prevent the wastage of water, if water will payed for homes it can help in decreasing water westage. for instance, In some metro cities indivisuals are paying water bills which has many advantages as a reason over usage of water decresed.

overall, fresh and clean water is right for everyone and it should be free for every one because is play significant role in daily lives. furthermore, free of charge water increasing over usage of water but i strongly belive that it should be free for everyone because if athorities providing un-charged water so who families are finacially disadvantage can afford it easily.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You give a clear overall view: you agree that clean water should be free, and you support this with its importance for household activities and health, as well as affordability for financially disadvantaged families. You also acknowledge the counterargument that free water may encourage waste, so the response engages with both sides of the question. However, the discussion is only partly developed: the examples about roadside families and water bills in metro cities are vague, and the link between paying for water and reducing waste is asserted rather than explained. The conclusion repeats your position but does not resolve this tension in detail. Develop each main point with a clearer explanation or a specific, relevant example to make the argument more complete and convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, a paragraph supporting free water, a paragraph presenting a disadvantage, and a conclusion. Linking expressions such as “moreover,” “however,” and “overall” help signal the direction of the argument. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow, and some connections are unclear. For example, “which can prevent the wastage of water” does not clearly explain how charging households would prevent waste, while the final sentence combines affordability and overuse without a clear relationship between them. Repeated references to water being a right also limit development. Organise each paragraph around one main point, then explain and illustrate it in a clear sequence, using referencing and linking words precisely.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “basic need,” “crucial role,” “financially disadvantage,” and “water bills.” These choices show an attempt to discuss health, household use, and affordability. However, the range is limited and several inaccurate word choices or collocations make parts of the argument hard to understand, such as “people healthy life,” “roadside families are drinking,” and “water westage.” Spelling and word-form errors, including “indivisual,” “negativaly,” and “decresed,” are also noticeable. Build a more reliable set of topic phrases and check spelling and collocations carefully. For example, use “people’s health,” “families living by the roadside,” and “water wastage” to express your ideas more naturally.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentence forms, including a reason clause beginning “because” and a conditional idea about charging households. However, the longer structures are often faulty, and errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction frequently make the meaning difficult to follow. Examples include “one of the main reason is,” “water also have,” “many people are effected … and it prevent,” and “if water will payed for homes.” Several sentences also lack a clear grammatical structure, particularly “majority of works in homes are can not do without help of water.” Practise forming accurate subject–verb patterns and conditional sentences, and use full stops to separate ideas when a sentence becomes difficult to control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.