Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-10
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
Water is the most essential natural resources for human survival and other living organisms. Providing fresh clean water to everyone should be basic necessity. However, government should charge to excessive use and non essential purpose, and it should be free for local people for essential use.
On the one hand, there are several benefits of having free clean water for drinking. Firstly, it would help to prevent waterborne disease such as cholera, typhoid and diarrhoea. Contaminated water is the main cause for these diseases. Secondly, It would help to lower salary people or poor people, who mostly struggle for basic necessities, getting free water for drinking would help them to save money for other important basic needs such as, education, healthcare, food. Thus, government should provide free drinking to everyone.
On the other hand, there are some disadvantages of all the water free of charge. for instance, some people use water unnecessarily like tap running, long time shower, use water for gardening, swimming pools and washing their cars without knowing the importance of natural resource. Industries and agriculture sites use a huge amount of fresh water for their work, excessive use of water in industries for free, it would discourage them to apply water saving methods. Thus, government should charge them appropriately.
In conclusion, providing fresh water to every human for free would encourage them to better health development and save money. However, excessive use and non essential purpose should charge appropriate would be best option for balance environment system. we could save our limited natural resource for future generation.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0
Your position is clear: you support free water for essential household needs while arguing that excessive or non-essential use should be charged. You address both sides and give relevant support, including waterborne illnesses, the financial pressure on poorer households, and waste by households and industries. These examples extend your main points and keep the response focused on the question. However, some claims remain broad: for example, the health benefit is asserted without explaining how free provision would ensure water is clean, and the discussion of industrial use could be linked more directly to the principle of a basic household right. Clarifying exactly what should be free and how charges would apply would make the argument more fully developed.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your position, two body paragraphs present contrasting considerations, and the conclusion restates your view. Sequencing within the paragraphs is generally logical, and signposts such as “On the one hand,” “Secondly,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the argument. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and shows some of the flexibility associated with stronger cohesion. However, the repeated “Thus” and formulaic transitions make connections somewhat mechanical. Some sentences also combine several ideas without clear links, particularly the sentence beginning “Industries and agriculture sites use a huge amount…” Use clearer sentence boundaries and refer back explicitly to the distinction between essential household use and other uses.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “waterborne disease,” “contaminated water,” “basic necessities,” “excessive use,” and “water saving methods.” These choices make the main ideas understandable, and you attempt some less common expressions relevant to the topic. However, several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or awkward, such as “lower salary people,” “free drinking,” and “balance environment system.” There are also spelling and form issues, including “non essential” and “diarrhoea” being inconsistently handled in the text. Aim for more precise, natural phrasing and check word forms: for example, distinguish “low-income households” from “lower salaries,” and use “free drinking water” rather than “free drinking.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “who” and “which,” and the overall meaning is usually clear. However, errors in agreement, articles, sentence construction, and punctuation occur across the response. For example, “Water is the most essential natural resources” has a singular–plural mismatch, while “government should charge to excessive use” has an incomplete grammatical pattern. The sentence beginning “Industries and agriculture sites use…” becomes a comma splice, and “However, excessive use and non essential purpose should charge appropriate” lacks a clear subject and verb structure. Improve accuracy by checking each sentence for a complete subject–verb pattern, correct articles, and appropriate punctuation, especially when joining independent clauses.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.