Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Acess clean water is a basic human right and evry home should have a water supply however provide free of charge is not a good idea, so, i largelly disagree with this statement.

acsessibility of clean water for every one in the society is very good either they are from poor background or rich clean water is basic human right which prevent them from many type of disease like flu which are generally transimited by the help of infected water. for instance, in my society the disinfected clean water is provided to evey citizen by whicch they ae not infected by malaria but in past they was drink water from tubewell which cause them diarihia, fevar, malaria etc because the source of water is not cleaned.

meanwhile, provide water supply free of charge flow lots of the money of government which is not a good option because it creates lots of problem in development of the country due to insufficent budget becuse if government supply free of charge then they loss many budget in the water. for example, delhi govermnet is supply free of charge clean water to the poor by which they are spend around 50% of their budget on in water and the other facility is not provided to the public like, no development of proper road, hospitals, public school which create very tension to their public.

in conclusion, acess to clean water is basic human right but provided free of charge is not a healthy steps beacuse create severe problem in the society.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you support access to clean water but largely oppose making the supply free. You address both sides of the prompt and give relevant reasons, including the health risks of contaminated water and the possible effect of free provision on public spending. The examples about tubewell water and Delhi help illustrate these points. However, some claims are not fully explained or qualified—for example, the link between free water and spending “around 50%” of a government budget is asserted without context, and the consequences for other services could be developed more carefully. To strengthen the response, explain how a basic, affordable or subsidised supply could protect access while limiting pressure on public funds.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs present supporting reasons, and a conclusion restates your position. The progression from health benefits to the cost of free provision is logical, and examples are placed alongside the relevant points. Cohesion is sometimes mechanical, however, with “for instance,” “meanwhile,” and “for example” doing much of the linking. Some sentences also contain several ideas without clear internal organisation, particularly the long sentence listing roads, hospitals and schools. Use clearer topic sentences and divide complex explanations into shorter units. More precise referencing would also help readers follow who “they” refers to in the examples.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “basic human right,” “infected water,” “government,” and “development,” so your main ideas can generally be understood. However, the range is limited and several spelling and word-choice errors make reading less smooth, such as “Acess,” “evry,” “largelly,” and “diarihia.” Some combinations are also unnatural: “flow lots of the money of government” and “not a healthy steps” do not express your meaning idiomatically. Build a more accurate set of topic phrases, such as “place a strain on public finances” and “waterborne diseases,” and check spelling and word forms carefully. This would make your argument clearer and more precise.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including a reason clause beginning “because” and a contrast introduced by “however.” The overall meaning is usually recoverable, but sentence structures and verb forms are often inaccurate. For example, “the other facility is not provided” and “they are spend” show problems with verb construction, while “in past they was drink” combines tense and agreement errors. Articles, plurals and punctuation also need attention; the opening sentence joins several clauses without clear punctuation. Practise forming accurate past-tense sentences and checking subject–verb agreement, then use full stops to separate complete ideas. Greater control of these patterns would make your reasoning easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.