Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is often argued that the water should be provided at every home without any cost, while it is true that its is a basic right of people and should be easily available for everyone. I firmly disagree with the viewpoint because it can increase the wastage of water and also there might be no water left for future generation.

To commence with, one of the main significant reason is that the wastage of water will increase. This can be attributed to the fact that nowadays, most of the people washes their vehicles on daily basis. In other words, the usage of water in households increased significantly from last ten years due to loundry and washing machine. So, this free cost water can make them more confident and also make the water unvaluable among the citizens. For instance, in today's world, specifically in urban areas there are certain problem related to the waters largely because of service stations that wash cars on daily basis and waste alot of clean water. Consequently, this free of cost water facility can casue watyer wastage in more greater amount.

Moreover, another curcial factor to consider is that there would be less no water remains for future people's. The reason behind this is many countries already facing the shortage of water specially in their big cities. Furthermore, there are also some policies from governments to reduce the water usage and it could be save for later citizens. For example, in China, there are alot of rules and fine on wastage of water that makes the society members aware about the concequences of water wastage.

In conclusion, although its a necessory person right but I strongly disagree with this idea beacause of the reasons, firstly more wastage of water and left less amount of water for next generation.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you disagree because free water could encourage waste and reduce supplies for future generations. Both reasons are relevant, and you support them with examples involving household car washing, urban service stations, and water-use policies in China. This addresses the main question. However, the argument is not fully developed: the examples are asserted rather than explained in detail, and the link between charging for water and preventing waste could be made more explicit. The second point also needs clarification, since rules to reduce consumption do not directly show that free household supply would leave less water for future people. Develop each reason with a clearer explanation and a more precise example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a conclusion that restates your position. Signposting such as “To commence with,” “Moreover,” and “In conclusion” helps readers follow the progression, and the ideas are generally arranged logically. This shows a coherent arrangement, while some linking remains mechanical and a few connections are unclear. For example, “Consequently” introduces a repeated claim about waste rather than a distinct result, and the relationship between government policies and future water availability could be explained more directly. Use fewer formulaic transitions and make the cause-and-effect links between each example and your argument explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “wastage,” “shortage,” “policies,” and “future generation,” and you attempt more specific expressions such as “service stations” and “water usage.” However, noticeable spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision, including “loundry,” “unvaluable,” “curcial,” “casue,” and “concequences.” Some phrases are also awkward or repetitive, such as “free cost water” and repeated references to water being wasted. These errors do not prevent the reader from understanding your main points, but they limit the range and naturalness of the language. Check spelling carefully and learn common collocations, such as “free water supply,” “water conservation,” and “impose fines for waste.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a reason clause beginning “because” and explanations introduced by “This can be attributed to the fact that.” The overall meaning is usually clear, but some errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction remain. For example, “most of the people washes” should use a plural verb, while “there would be less no water remains” has an unclear and faulty structure. In the opening, “its is” also disrupts accuracy, and the final sentence has an incomplete construction around “although.” Aim to produce more consistently controlled sentences: check subject–verb agreement, use complete clauses, and read each sentence aloud to identify missing or conflicting words.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.