Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-10
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Access to clean water is a fundamental right for all the nations of the world. I firmly believe that every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge. Government has fundamnetal responsibility to ensure the access to clean water to its nation.
The primary reason to have access to clean water, people not only depend on water for drinking but also for household chores as well. Without access to clean water , there many disease that can attack, such as cholera and diarrhea etc. The situation is particularly concerned to children and elderly people in the home. In the past,many people had died because of not getting access to clean water in several states.
According to the Sustainable Development Goal 6, Clean Water has been the fundamental right that should be given by the Government. Govt. should invest in water treatment facilities and improve sanitation in rural as well as urban areas.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that access to clean water is an essential human right rather than a privilege. Govt. must ensure that everyone can obtain sufficient and and safe water without facing financial issues, as public health and human dignity depend on it.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
Your position is clear: you firmly support free household water, and you give relevant reasons, including drinking, domestic use, disease prevention and government investment. However, the response addresses the task only partially because the reasons are mostly asserted rather than explained or supported with a specific example. For instance, you mention cholera and diarrhoea but do not show how free provision would prevent these illnesses or explain how the service should be funded. The reference to Sustainable Development Goal 6 is relevant, but its connection to the claim that water should be free is not developed. The response is 187 words, below the required 250, which limits the opportunity to develop your argument. Extend each main point with explanation and a relevant example.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a coherent overall arrangement: it states your view, presents reasons and a policy point, then concludes by restating your position. Paragraphing helps distinguish these stages, and links such as “The primary reason,” “According to” and “In conclusion” guide the reader. However, progression within the body is limited: the discussion moves from household uses to disease and then to the SDG without fully connecting these points. Some references are also unclear, as in “the situation is particularly concerned to children,” where the relationship between the situation and the people affected is difficult to follow. Develop a clearer sequence within each paragraph, using explanation and examples to connect claims rather than relying mainly on signposting phrases.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “fundamental right,” “water treatment facilities,” “sanitation” and “public health,” which allows you to communicate the central argument. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “without facing financial issues.” However, the range is limited and some word choices or collocations are inaccurate, including “ensure the access to clean water to its nation” and “the situation is particularly concerned to children.” Spelling errors such as “fundamnetal” and the informal abbreviation “Govt.” also reduce control. Aim for precise, natural combinations and check spelling; for example, use “ensure access to clean water for its citizens” and “particularly concerning for children and older people.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You use mostly straightforward sentence patterns and attempt some longer structures, including “Without access to clean water, there many disease that can attack” and the final sentence beginning “Govt. must ensure that…”. The main ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors affect clarity. Examples include the missing verb in “there many disease,” the incorrect plural agreement in “many disease,” and the incomplete construction “The primary reason to have access to clean water, people not only depend…”. The sentence about children and elderly people also has an incorrect grammatical pattern. Build accuracy by using complete clauses and checking subject–verb agreement, articles and plural forms. You can then add controlled complex sentences to explain cause and effect.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.