Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Having access to clean water is basic human right and every home should have it free of charge.Although i strongly believe that waster is a basic necessity of every human but I disagree of giving everybody unlimited water access.

Clean water should be accessable to everyone as it is the basic human right and is the source of life for humas as well as plants and other life beings.It should be available to everybody regardless of their income because of it importance in out life.Not only it is used in drinking but also in cooking, cleaning, watering plants and many other things.If it is to be monitored by the income it would be disasterous for many lower incomed people.

Treating all consumption as free could lead to a finacial burden on government because it can lead to free of charge maintainance of system delivering free water expecially to the areas where water level are really low and the only way of having water delivered to them is through pipes and other systems which could cause burden on government.It could also lead to the water shortage in areas where underground water level are low and that can be only controlled by the monitoring of water wastage though government.

In conclusion water should be free of charge for everybody but should be monitored in terms of water wastage and the delivery systems of water should be maintained though people taxes

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you support access to essential water but oppose unlimited, unmonitored use. You give relevant reasons, including the needs of lower-income households, the cost of maintaining delivery systems, and the risk of shortages. However, the response only partly develops the task: the distinction between water being free and consumption being unlimited is central, but it is not explained in enough detail, and the conclusion introduces taxation without showing how this would work alongside free household supply. The response also falls 12 words short of the required minimum. To strengthen the argument, explain what amount should be free, how excess use could be charged, and support one point with a specific example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting reasons, and a conclusion. The progression from water as a basic need to the financial and environmental concerns is generally logical, and linking phrases such as “Not only” and “In conclusion” help signal relationships. However, the first paragraph’s contrast between a human right and unlimited access could be connected more clearly to the later argument about monitoring. Some sentences are very long, especially the discussion of delivery systems, making the relationships between ideas harder to follow. Use clearer sentence boundaries and more precise referencing, and organise the argument around a consistent distinction between a free basic supply and charges or controls for excessive use.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “basic human right,” “financial burden,” “water shortage,” and “underground water level.” These choices make the main ideas understandable, and you attempt some topic-specific language. However, spelling and word-choice errors are noticeable, including “waster,” “accessable,” “humas,” “disasterous,” and “maintainance.” Some phrases are also unnatural or imprecise, such as “lower incomed people” and “monitoring of water wastage though government.” These issues limit the accuracy and flexibility of your vocabulary, even though the intended meaning is usually recoverable. Check spelling carefully and learn natural collocations such as “low-income households,” “water consumption,” and “government regulation.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional construction (“If it is to be monitored by the income…”) and a sentence beginning “Although.” This shows some range, but several structures are not controlled accurately. For example, “Although I strongly believe that waster is a basic necessity of every human but…” combines two contrasting conjunctions, while “Clean water should be accessable to everyone” lacks the correct grammatical form after “should.” There are also errors with articles, agreement, and punctuation, such as “is basic human right” and the missing spaces after full stops. These errors sometimes make the reader pause. Practise accurate clause construction and proofread for articles, verb forms, agreement, and sentence boundaries.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.