Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-10
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
It is non deniable concept that human cannot survive without water and clear water is a legal right for human being.Many individulas have ongoing debate weather household should have free water supply or there should be some modest charges.I belive free water supply can lead a wastage of water sources and lack of responsibility towards society and environment.Although i have partal view points on this satement,because in many countries have few natural water resources to fullfil their daliy needs.i will enlightend points to clear the concept of this topic.
To begin with my first argument,every household has continously water supply nowadays,but people do not have thought to waste water on unwanted resouces as well as they do not think to need water in future.For example, running taps,water consuming crops,industeraliztion so on,are the main reson of wastage of water.Water without charges may dangerous for natural resources as well,because people use the water without any need and it may cause for next generation.Furthermore,government should apply modest charges to reduse the wastage of the water so that it can use for other purposes and save for next generation.
On the other hand,many countries are facing a serious droughts and people do'nt have sufficient source of water for their basic need.Due to that, government should arrange water from native countires which cost the whole country GDP.Moreover,many authorities should spend money on pipelines to supply water.People in such areas knows the real cost of water because in drought areas people do not have much income sources as well.So that government plays a vital role for their people.For instance Africa and its many regions have the situation of lack of natural water resources.
To conclude,water should be free for every house for thier basic need but to reduce the wastage of water government should apply sum amount according to income for water save for future.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address the central issue and present a recognisable, though qualified, position: you argue that water should meet basic needs while modest charges can discourage waste. The two body paragraphs offer relevant reasons, including unnecessary use and the costs of supplying drought-affected areas. However, the position is not fully consistent: the introduction says free supply can encourage waste, while the conclusion says water should be free and charges should also be applied. Clarify whether basic household use is free and whether charges apply only to excess consumption. Some points, such as the claim that governments should obtain water from other countries, are introduced without explaining feasibility or giving a specific example. Developing these ideas and supporting them more precisely would make the response more complete.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, two contrasting body paragraphs and a conclusion. Signposts such as “To begin with,” “On the other hand” and “To conclude” help readers follow the broad progression. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. For example, “Due to that” does not clearly show how drought leads to the proposed government action, and “So that government plays a vital role” is not smoothly linked to the preceding point. The introduction also moves quickly from the debate to the writer’s position, while the conclusion combines free provision and charges without resolving their relationship. Use clearer references and connect each example directly to the claim it supports; this would make the progression more consistently easy to follow.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “natural water resources,” “modest charges,” “drought” and “pipelines,” and the main meaning is generally understandable. There is also some effort to vary expression rather than repeat only basic terms. However, spelling and word-choice errors are noticeable, as in “industeraliztion,” “resouces” and “weather” for “whether.” Several phrases are unnatural or imprecise, including “water consuming crops,” “native countires” and “save for next generation.” These choices sometimes make the intended meaning less clear. Build accuracy with common topic collocations, such as “water-intensive crops,” “domestic water supply” and “conserve water for future generations,” and check spelling and word forms during revision.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You use both simple statements and attempts at longer, more complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “because,” “although” and “so that.” This shows an effort to express relationships between ideas. However, control is uneven, and errors in sentence structure, agreement, articles and punctuation recur. For example, “Although i have partal view points … because in many countries have few natural water resources” is an incomplete and confusing construction; “people … knows” has a subject–verb agreement error; and “many countries are facing a serious droughts” has a number mismatch. Several sentences also run together without appropriate spacing or punctuation. Practise building complete sentences around one main clause, then check agreement, articles and sentence boundaries, especially in longer constructions.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.