Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

I completely agree with the statment that every home should have a free water supply. In my opinion,water is the need of our daily life and we can't survive without water, therefore it should be supplied directly to the homes.

For instance, if the people bring the water from water wells and rivers to their homes, so then they will get tried and its a very time taking process.

If i talk about my own experience, 10 years ago there was no water supply supply in our village.Therefore we will have to bring water from the water well which was created by our government. In the begining it was good but after some time many people were frustrated from it, so then the people sent a letter to the village conslor and told him that we need a water supply at our homes. After some weeks he approved our request and start working on water supply, as a result now we have direct water supply at our homes, without any hurdle we can use water.

In conclusion, water supply should provided to every home free of cost , because we can't ressist without water. The governmet should invest more money on the needs of people and try to solve their problems, water supply without any charges is a good benefit for everyone and it will save the time and energy of people which they can use on other activities.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear from the opening: you agree that homes should receive free water, and you maintain this view in the conclusion. The village experience is relevant and gives a concrete example of how a household supply can save people time and effort. However, the response only partly develops the question: it explains the convenience of a direct supply, but does not clearly justify why the water itself should be free or consider how governments could fund this. The claim that water is essential is repeated rather than extended with further reasoning. The response is also 11 words below the required minimum. Develop a second supporting reason and explain the link between access as a right and free provision.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, an example from your village, and a conclusion. The personal account gives the essay a logical central thread, and phrases such as “For instance” and “In conclusion” help signal the stages. However, the progression is sometimes mechanical, with several ideas joined by “so” and “therefore,” and the example is presented as one long sequence rather than being divided into clearer steps. Some links are also unclear, as in “if the people bring the water … so then they will get tried.” Use a separate paragraph for each main reason, and connect each example explicitly to the claim that water should be free, not only supplied directly.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough basic vocabulary to communicate your main position and personal example, including “water supply,” “government,” “frustrated,” and “save the time and energy.” However, the range is limited and several expressions are inaccurate or repetitive, which makes parts of the essay less clear. For example, “get tried” appears to mean “get tired,” while “time taking process” is an awkward phrase; “without any hurdle” is also not a natural collocation in this context. Spelling errors such as “statment,” “begining,” and “governmet” are noticeable. Build a more precise range for discussing access, cost, and public services, and check spelling and collocations during revision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentences, including a conditional opening and a sequence describing the village’s water project. However, control is inconsistent, and errors in sentence structure, tense, and punctuation sometimes make the meaning harder to follow. For example, “if the people bring …, so then they will” combines two linking structures, while “10 years ago … we will have to bring” shifts incorrectly from past to future. The conclusion also needs a passive form: “water supply should provided” should be “water should be provided.” There are run-on sentences and missing spaces after full stops. Practise building accurate complex sentences and check tense consistency, articles, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.