Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Clean water is the most valuable resource of nature. No living being can survive without water. Though it is a natural product, but it is becoming rare day by day. There are many reasons behind it. But the main reasons I can mention are pollution, over-population etc.

My opinion on this issue is- access to clean water is a basic human right. So, it should be free of cost or tax.

In the rural area, there are many natural sources of water such as river, ponds, wells. People can have clean water for cooking, cleaning, farming and drinking. But when it comes to the urban areas, the water becomes polluted. The unplanned drainage system and the quanity of waste materials are the main reasons behind it according to me. So, in these areas, people can not have access to clean water. Either they have to use electric filter to purify the water, or give taxes to the government for the access to clean water. But there are many lower class people who lives in the slums, they cannot have any of these. So, they have no choice but to use toxic water daily. They fall sick and their children suffers from malnutrition.

I have a personal story to add here. Recently I have travelled to Japan to visit my cousin's house. What made me surprised is the fact that they drink water direct from the tap and there is no water bill. But in my country this is impossible. We have to give tax for the water supply. But the water is still not clean enough So, we had to bought a filter also. It costs too much in the year.

So, I believe, it is a responsibility of government to supply clean water to the citizens and that should be free of charge

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you agree that clean water should be supplied without charge, and you give relevant reasons involving pollution, poverty and health. The example of your experience in Japan also helps illustrate the contrast with your own country. However, some parts of the argument are less fully developed than others. For instance, you mention that free access is a human right but do not explain how governments could fund treatment and delivery, or whether free provision should apply to every household regardless of use. The rural-versus-urban comparison is relevant, but the claim that rural sources provide clean water needs qualification. Develop these points with clearer explanation and support to make the response more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has an overall progression from the importance of water, to your position, supporting examples and a concluding statement. Paragraphing also separates the main stages of the discussion. Some links, however, feel mechanical or unclear: repeated openings such as “But” and “So” connect ideas loosely, while “Though it is a natural product, but…” uses two contrasting signals together. The shift from general discussion to the personal story is understandable, but the relationship between the Japan example and your argument about universal free provision could be made more explicit. Organise the body around distinct reasons, and use referencing and transitions to show how each example supports your position.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “pollution,” “drainage system,” “purify,” “water supply” and “malnutrition,” which makes the main ideas clear. There are also attempts at more specific phrasing, such as “unplanned drainage system.” Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or imprecise, including “free of cost or tax,” “the quanity of waste materials,” and “drink water direct from the tap.” Spelling errors such as “quanity” also reduce accuracy. Aim for more natural combinations and precise terms, for example, “provided free of charge,” “the volume of waste,” and “drink water directly from the tap.” This would make the vocabulary more controlled and appropriate to an academic essay.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional contrast in “when it comes to the urban areas” and a relative clause in “people who lives in the slums.” The meaning is generally understandable, but some errors in agreement, verb forms, articles and sentence construction remain. For example, “people who lives” should be “people who live,” “their children suffers” should be “their children suffer,” and “we had to bought” should be “we had to buy.” The opening “Though it is a natural product, but…” also combines structures incorrectly. Review subject–verb agreement and verb patterns, and proofread sentence boundaries and punctuation; greater accuracy across these structures would strengthen the response.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.