Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is often argued that access to clean water it is a genaral human right. Consequently every family should give a water supply for fully free no charge. While this trend may bring some negative aspects, I largely agree with that idea because of children can learn from it and support rural communities.

One major advantage of this development is that children can learn from it. This is because when people access clean water for everyone to consume that can encourage teenager to develop society. Moreover, children may lead in the future so they can learn how help people. Another benefit is that improve quality of life because people can maintain their lifestyle. Furthermore, they can enjoy healthier and more comfortable live. For example, families can use clean water for drinking, cooking, and washing. As a result, it can create a strong bond in the society and everyone can understand others pain. Therefore, access to fresh water is a great huminity.

Another significant factor to consider is that support rural communities. In other words, most of the countryside areas limited access to fresh water. This is because rural people may suffer from money shortage and that is the main issue. Furthermore, clean water can improve public health and many people work on the street so they most of the time find fresh water consuming. Additionally, if they consume clean water during work time they do not face any kind of issue and instead that can give them more energy. For nstance, fresh water may save people to illness and give them better lifestye. This demonstrate that I believe access to fresh water can have numerous benefits.

In conclusion, although if people get enough water for their consuming they may waste valuable water, I believe that access pure water it is a positive development overall. This is because teenager can learn how to help people and it can support countryside people.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear overall: you largely agree that households should receive clean water free of charge, and you give relevant reasons involving children and rural communities. The examples of using water for drinking, cooking and washing, and of rural residents having limited access, help connect the topic to everyday needs. However, the reasons are not consistently explained in relation to the central question of whether the supply should be free. For instance, the claim that children “can learn from it” is difficult to follow, and the point about people working outdoors needing water is not developed into a clear argument about cost or access. Explain how free provision would address these needs, and support each main reason with a more specific example or consequence.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. Paragraphs generally focus on separate reasons, and signposts such as “Moreover,” “Another significant factor,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the broad direction. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear: the first body paragraph moves from children’s learning to quality of life, social bonds and empathy without showing how these points connect. Some linking phrases are also mechanical or do not express the relationship clearly, as in “Furthermore” before the point about public health. Use fewer, more precise transitions, and organise each paragraph around one main claim followed by explanation and a directly relevant example.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “access to clean water,” “rural communities,” “public health” and “quality of life,” so the reader can identify the subject and your main ideas. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate enough to make parts difficult to understand. Examples include “a great huminity,” “fresh water consuming,” “save people to illness” and “more comfortable live.” There are also spelling errors such as “genaral,” “nstance” and “lifestye.” Build a more reliable set of phrases for discussing water access, health and affordability, and check spelling and word forms carefully. Prefer precise, natural expressions over repeated use of “fresh water” and “people.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, using clauses introduced by “because,” “when,” “if” and “although.” This shows an effort to vary sentence structure, but many attempts contain errors that make the meaning unclear. For example, “access to clean water it is” has an unnecessary subject, while “Another benefit is that improve quality of life” lacks a clear grammatical subject. Agreement and verb forms are also problematic in “rural areas limited access” and “This demonstrate.” In the conclusion, “although if” combines two structures incorrectly. Practise forming complete clauses with a clear subject and correctly matched verb, and review articles, agreement and conditional or concessive clauses. More accurate control of these patterns would make your ideas easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.