Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Nowadays, it is often argued that pure water is a basic right of human. Many people believe that every household should have fresh and free water supply facility, while others say the opposite view. However, I completely agree with the former view.

There are several reasons why I think that clean water supply without any cost is one of our necessary rights. Firstly, people can not go a single day without water because it is very important thing in our daily life. We utilise it for drinking, washing goods and planting trees. Sometimes, drinking polluted water leads to several waterborne diseases (diarrhea, cholera and typhoid). For example, if a student becomes sick, he can not go to school that also may impact on his study. Moreover, contaminated water often brings skin promlems like allergy. As a consequence, governments should take necessary steps as soon as possible to set up a fresh water supply facility throughout the households.

Furthermore, majority people of our community can not afford the cost of fresh and clean water. As we live in a low-income country, the people face hurdles to run their family let alone purchase the subscription of water supply. In today's world living costs outweigh earnings because price of every single product is growing day by day. As a result, most of the people are unable to access fresh water supply. Therefore, this water facility must be free of charge so that all of the people can consume this convenience.

In conclusion, clean water supply facility should be fully free of charge through the households to make their lives straightforward.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction—“I completely agree”—and the response stays focused on the benefits of providing clean water without charge. You give relevant reasons, including health risks from polluted water and the difficulty low-income households face in paying for water. The examples of waterborne diseases and a student missing school help make the health point concrete. However, the two reasons are not developed equally: the affordability paragraph mainly repeats that people cannot afford the service, without explaining how free provision could be funded or addressing possible limits to the proposal. The conclusion restates your view but adds little. More specific explanation and a developed example would make the argument more convincing and complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a conclusion. The progression from health to affordability is logical, and signposts such as “Firstly,” “Furthermore,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the argument. Some linking is mechanical, however, with repeated “As a result” and “Therefore” making connections feel formulaic rather than fully integrated. A few references are also unclear: in “that also may impact on his study,” “that” could refer to the student’s illness or absence. Improve cohesion by varying transitions, making pronoun references explicit, and linking each example directly to the claim it supports. These refinements would make the organisation feel more fluent.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “waterborne diseases,” “contaminated water,” “low-income country,” and “living costs.” These choices communicate the main ideas, and some less common terms show an effort to be precise. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “pure water,” “fresh water supply facility,” “purchase the subscription of water supply,” and “consume this convenience.” There are also spelling errors, including “promlems,” and some repetition of “free,” “clean,” and “water supply.” Choose more natural phrases such as “safe drinking water,” “pay for a water connection,” and “access this essential service,” and check spelling to improve precision and fluency.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional example (“if a student becomes sick…”) and cause-and-effect structures. Most sentences remain understandable, and the errors rarely prevent the reader from following your argument. Some grammatical inaccuracies persist, however: “a basic right of human” needs a plural or possessive form, “a fresh and free water supply facility” has article and number problems, and “majority people” is missing an article and a preposition. In “that also may impact on his study,” the clause structure and reference are awkward. Review articles, plural forms, and sentence construction, and aim for more consistently accurate complex sentences while retaining the variety you already attempt.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.