Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 20 · 2026-11-11
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Access to clean water is a basic human right. Therefore every home should have a water supply that is provided free of charge.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
It is often argued that providing clean water to the inhabitants is thier basic human right and all of them should have access to it free of any cost.I completely agree with this statement because providing fresh water can save people from waterborn diseases and it would help the poor community financially.
To begin with healthcare,clean water is essential for maintaining good health.It provides help to people to prevent themselves from diseases.If government would charge on fresh water then it will make difficulties for poor people to purchase water for their survival.Whereas,it is known tha tinhabitants need water for drinking,cookin,bathing and for personal hygiene.So,disadvantaged people would consume contaiminated water.As a result,they would suffer with different fatal diseases.For instance,in many developing countries,people cannot afford fresh water and when they use pollluted water then they face diseases such as cholera and typhoid.
Furthermore,proving fresh water in free would help those people who cannnot bear the additional charges of it.If government provide them with clean water, then they will be able to spent their money on other living expenses.
In coclusion,I completely agree with this because it will make them able to concentrate and spend money on other needs of their life such as education and food.So, government should play role in this matter and they should consider it their responsibility rather than commercial services.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
Your position is clear from the introduction (“I completely agree”) and remains consistent in the conclusion. You give relevant reasons: clean water can prevent disease and free provision can ease financial pressure on poorer households. The examples of cholera and typhoid help illustrate the health argument. However, the financial point is only briefly explained, and the response does not fully explore how free household supply could be provided or why it should apply to every home. The response is also 28 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to develop and support your ideas. Add a specific example or explanation to each main point and address the universal nature of the proposal more directly.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. The ideas generally follow a sensible order, moving from health benefits to financial benefits, and signposts such as “To begin with,” “Furthermore” and “In conclusion” make the progression easy to follow. Some links are mechanical or unclear, however. “Whereas” does not connect smoothly to the preceding sentence, and the shift from contaminated water to disease could be explained more explicitly. The second body paragraph is very short, so its main idea is not developed into a balanced argument. Use clearer links between cause and effect, and expand each paragraph around one central point.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “clean water,” “waterborne diseases,” “contaminated water,” “personal hygiene” and “fatal diseases,” which helps communicate the main argument. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “disadvantaged people” and “commercial services.” However, spelling errors and inaccurate or unnatural word combinations are noticeable, including “thier,” “pollluted,” “proving fresh water in free” and “suffer with different fatal diseases.” These sometimes make the reader pause to interpret your meaning. Aim for accurate, natural collocations and proofread carefully; for example, say “provide clean water free of charge” and “suffer from diseases.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including conditional forms such as “If government would charge…” and a result clause beginning “As a result.” This shows an effort to express cause and consequence, and your overall meaning is usually understandable. However, some sentence patterns are faulty, and errors in verb forms, articles and sentence boundaries recur. For example, “If government provide them” needs a correctly formed subject and verb, while “they will be able to spent” should use the base form after “to.” Several sentences also run together without appropriate spacing or punctuation, as in the opening. Practise accurate conditional structures and check each sentence for a clear subject, verb and ending.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.